post: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/60933022
Sidebar: This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Aussie.zone rules:
Golden rule - don’t be a dick. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your grandmother, don’t post it.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn.
No Ads / Spamming.
Nothing illegal in Australia.
Hmmmm seems like some pro labor mod is doing some apologia for crimes that people hung at Nuremberg for.
Forgive me for dispensing with civility while hellfire rains down.
I would prefer this post be restored or the rules be updated for clarity
deleted by creator
If submitting news articles with titles that aren’t copies of the source is against the rules then that should be written down and communicated.
I’m not the only person to do this, but my post is removed. why?
deleted by creator
Why is it ok for mods to remove posts without reference to rules?
What is the point of rules if they don’t bind mods?
deleted by creator
yes I did, no response
Yes… no response in the sub 1 hour timeframe since you messaged me.
I consider editorialised headlines to break global rule 0 of AZ, especially when being deliberately antagonistic in attempting to provoke a fight from those with differing opinions to you. ie don’t be a dick. If you want to pick a fight, do it elsewhere.
In this case, I agree with the broad strokes of your opinion on the topic of the article you linked. Repost it with the original published title and it will stay. Add your own commentary to the post, not the headline.
can you amend the rules to clarify this stance please?
No. AZ isn’t run by rules lawyers, no interest in posting every single possible action that contravenes “don’t be a dick”.
Did you message them at 4am on a Monday morning AEST? Because it looks like you did.
Oh i’ve definitely seen stuff warned / removed over edited headlines before. Even seen posts restored after mistaken shots (hosting site had chnaged title but left original URL)
Dunno about the mods, but the AZ admins are 100% happy to continue to platform racists (ikt).
When alerted and given information, they’ll maybe remove one or two offending posts but do absolutely nothing about the user despite a repeated history of it.
As far as I’m concerned the instance is run in very very bad faith.
Edit: Lodion I see you’ve downvoted this, do you perhaps want to comment on why you refuse to take meaningful action against racism towards Aboriginal peoples and allow said racist to continue to operate on your platform?
Untrue. Starting with a statement of “fact” like that immediately has me questioning if you are posting in good faith.
The information you’ve previously compiled was either moderated already, or deleted by author when I saw most of if. What remained were ambiguous, possibly offensive comments if interpreted in particular ways . Either way… I didn’t see anything warranting further action than had already occurred. That and your actions at the time, harassing said user in every thread they posted in, had me take your input with a large grain of salt.
I don’t think there is anything I can say to convince you how wrong you are on this one. We do the best with the information available to us, and we’re only human.
As for your edit:
I’m not. I’m happy to ban users when it is warranted.
Can you point me towards any such content on AZ?
I’ve not seen any unaddressed reports for them that warrant action on my part. I’m not online 24x7 though, so often reports are addressed by other mods/admins before I see what was reported.
Looking over comments from this user, I see plenty to dislike. But I won’t ban a user because I dislike them, their opinions or necessarily how they express them.