The immediate catalyst, it seems, is an intensifying focus on capex, or capital expenditures. Microsoft revealed that its spending surged 66% to $37.5 billion in the latest quarter, even as growth in its Azure cloud business cooled slightly. Even more concerning to analysts, however, was a new disclosure that approximately 45% of the company’s $625 billion in remaining performance obligations (RPO)—a key measure of future cloud contracts—is tied directly to OpenAI, the company revealed after reporting earnings Wednesday afternoon. (Microsoft is both a major investor in and a provider of cloud-computing services to OpenAI.)

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      So much money is tied up in AI, that when it crashes you’re likely to end up poor, or worse, homeless, than being able to afford anything.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Pretty sure MS will just seize the OpenAi data centers and repurpose them for Azure and rent out compute time or use it for XBox streaming. Non of the hardware will reach the open market.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Regardless of who owns it or what they do with it, those GPUs will get sold on the used market with plenty of life left. Older AI GPUs, networking equipment (eg 100GbE), SAS drives, etc have been easy to find on eBay and other sites for a long time, because data centers replace hardware long before it’s expected to fail.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Exactly. They have like an 8 year depreciation, but they supposedly become obsolete in a couple of years for whatever cutting edge AI is supposed to be.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Since OpenAI just announced the possibility of bankruptcy, it’s definitely coming. It’s going to be wild for whichever idiot in charge at MS to go down in history as the man who ruined one of the most powerful and integral companies on earth.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          They don’t have a product with any actual value or use cases. The ads aren’t going to reverse that. If it were that simple then they would have been able to make profit with their subscription model.

          • gustofwind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think we’re quite a long way off before they actually crash and burn, if they ever do. We have no idea how much money the ads will inject and they also receive significant government contracts and will probably get a lot more going forward

            If the market can pretend Tesla is worth so much i think it can easily sustain AI for many years

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s already been several years. Tesla had an actual product that people wanted. Yes, they’ve been doing their best of late to torpedo their market share and brand name but at one point they were doing what they set out to do. Open AI has never done what they said they would do.

              • jj4211@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                Note that Tesla was clearly a viable business, I don’t see the justification for it being 3 times the value of ford, gm, Toyota, and Honda all put together.

                Generally people are not challenging the fundamental possibility of these as viable business, just that they don’t make sense at their valuations.

                Though I’ll agree that open ai particularly should get some skepticism. To the extent that actionable business models might emerge, I don’t see openai actually in a position to be a big party of any of it. Microsoft and Anthropic seem to mostly own business revenue, ChatGPT is generally not even providing the models people select when they are able to choose.

              • gustofwind@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Kinda but also not entirely. I know a lot of people who use ChatGPT and other AIs at work and it does basically exactly what they want and just gets better

                I’m not a proponent but the naysayer doomers are almost as wrong as the tech evangelists

                Is it overvalued? Sure

                Is it worthless? Absolutely not

                • krashmo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  That’s cool. I have yet to find a use case for AI. Am I doing it wrong or are they just bad with computers?

                  • Luckyfriend222@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I am with gustofwind here. I use AI to help me quickly draft up mindless policies, then read through it and edit it where needed. It is a lot faster than any typing I can do.

                    I also use it to help me find configs for stuff I deploy, but I make sure it attaches the source link for me, so I can read the original source docs and keep a sane approach to what I am doing.

                    Again, I also think it is way overvalued, but to say it has not helped me build successful stuff over the past 2 years would be a lie. My 2c

                  • Randynippletwist@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Yes, why do you care about the pointless corporate crap you produce . Ai slop is the desired result you are just letting your pride get in the way.

          • Baggie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            How would that even work as well? The ads will be in the website, doesn’t most stuff run through API calls? If you force everyone to start paying per call, the business model falls apart instantly.

            • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              API calls are already only paid, no?

              I’m guessing the ads will be embedded in the answers of the free users (like: it will add to the prompt something like “and don’t forget to plug the sponsor, ridge wallet”)

              • Baggie@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Oh actually are they? I admit I assumed they were doing the standard bullshit of everything is free to get you integrated, then they start charging. Actually maybe that already happened and this is the result of that.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Doubt that’ll happen for a few mor years unfortunately. I can’t imagine most of the hardware made for AI datacenters is compatible with consumer stuff :/

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        A lot of it hasn’t actually been made, though. The AI companies have put in orders for future production. That future capacity can be redirected with a wave of a pen.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yep the good times are over for now.

        And even if, it might turn into a black hole for an agonizingly long time.