• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What a bizarre response. Nowhere did I claim that he’s an organizer. Public political speech by a prominent political broadcast commentator (yea that’s what “viral streaming influencer” used to be called in the 1900s) is …not nothing. Saying he isn’t doing anything is like saying that political speech doesn’t do anything.

    Edit: you added the champagne socialist bit. Do I look like I care about this guy personally? He’s an influential political commentator that made a good point. In this thread it drew reactions from the “blu no matter whu” crowd and I called that out. That’s it.

    • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Doing this kind of politics

      He isn’t doing any kind of politics. He’s virtue-signaling.

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You’re judging his internal state of mind and disposition. I don’t give a flipping fuck about it right now. Even if he is just a champagne socialist virtue signaling, the objectively observable thing is “popular influencer is putting a political blackmail of the dem establishment in the discourse agenda”. Even under your set of assumptions his champaign socialist virtue signaling is not without real political impact.

            I mean fuck, an even shallower piece of nothing is sitting in the white house and his vapid brainfarts are for sure creating political impacts.