Representative Ted Lieu accused Attorney General Pam Bondi of lying under oath Wednesday, catching the Trump official in a bind after she claimed no evidence existed of young girls at parties attended by the president.
The California lawmaker highlighted that, under Bondi’s direction per a July 2025 memo, the Justice Department had “not uncovered evidence” that warranted investigations against “uncharged third parties.”
He then referred to recently released images of ex-Prince Andrew, depicting the disgraced British royal on all fours, towering over one of Epstein’s victims.
“These two photos staring you in the face are evidence of a crime and are more than enough evidence to predicate an investigation against former Prince Andrew,” Lieu said. “So I ask you, Attorney General Pam Bondi, why did you shut down this investigation last July and why have you not prosecuted former Prince Andrew?”
These people have no morals or ethics. The only thing we can do at this point is lock them up and throw away the key.
The problem is “these people” include 6 corrupt Supreme Court justices. Hard to have any justice if those administering it are corrupt to the core.
We are in dire need of a drastic change to the way we look at vigilante mob justice in our society at this point. It is literally the only option for actual justice and positive change when the justice system operates under a pay to win rule and the wealth gap is the highest it’s ever been since the gold standard was established.
Fun fact, the supreme court is only the highest appeal court because they say they are. The constitution actually says they’re a maritime court.
There’s more to it, but yeah, Congress can legally strip the court of power by establishing a new court.
The old court would still have the final say in maritime law. But little else.
IDK that sounds like you’re about to argue, that you don’t need a driver’s license or registration for your car, because you’re not driving, you’re traveling.
In any case it’s more expedient to approach this matter with torches and pitch forks, than to wait for congress to get their act together. Just remember who’ll appoint replacements for any justice you remove.
The whole concept of Judicial review didn’t exist before 1803 when the court granted itself that power.
Per the actual constitution;
A plain reading of that says that Congress can change all the rules at will except the Maritime and Ambassador stuff.
Congress can strip away the full appellate jurisdiction and replace it. At least one sitting congressman wants to do just that and replace the court with a random rotating bench pulled from the federal appeals courts.
Here’s an interview with the guy. He touches on the supreme court, but the main push is uncapping the House.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ9Zhu-zCCw
There’s more of us than there are of them.
Yeah, I do honestly think that the tribunal of six is going to require some… uh…
If we manage to somehow pull out of this horrific tailspin.
And by “we” I mean the justice system.
And by the “justice system” I mean these people.
By we, I meant we the people.
I’m gonna have to check my availability and get back to you on that.
This. The officers working in the house should have cuffed her and walked her to a detention cell on contempt alone.
Time for a second round of Nuremberg trials.