I’ve noticed a lot of posts lately that are just spam for slopware, often not even having anything to do with self-hosting. As sad as I am about it, I’m pretty close to unsubscribing to keep spam out of my Lemmy feeds.

Before doing so, though, I wanted to ask if there was any formal policy or rule for the community that could help cut down on thr spam, and if so, what would be most useful for me to do when I see a spam post? That I’d, is the Report button the right tool, is there some other way to let moderators know?

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    On your instance, yes. Those downvotes get dropped on my side, so I can’t see them, and neither can anyone else on a non-downvote instance. My proposal would address the issue of slop for everyone, whereas downvote proponents are just saying, “Yeah, well my way is better. Lemmy is only for people who do it my way.”

    If this thread is a lesson in anything, it’s that the bad habits of Reddit carried over, and people are so fucking lazy, they can’t be bothered to click the report button.

    • punksnotdead@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      downvote proponents are just saying, “Yeah, well my way is better. Lemmy is only for people who do it my way.”

      If anything you’re the one being obtuse and saying your way is better and that people must adapt to your way. Downvotes are the default behaviour of the software and the “reddit-like” experience of Lemmy

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        If better means “more inclusive,” then yes. It’s better. Did I say to stop downvoting? No. Did I tell people to abandon their downvoting-enabled instances? No (though have a look and see how I’ve been told multiple times to leave mine).

        Dunno why people are hellbent on excluding people who don’t want optional downvotes when non-optional reporting exists.

        But do go on about how I’m excluding the poor instances with downvotes by recommending an inclusive action that they also benefit from.