Police told Ngakyunkwokka: “If you don’t do the stat dec [statutory declaration] and name a person, you can be charged”. He was not told that he had to complete the statement even if he could not nominate the driver.
FFS if you’re going to continue being this much of a fuckwit and/or idiot I’m done with this conversation.
Where’s the lie? He was told he had to do the stat Dec and name a person, and that if he couldn’t name the person then he could be charged. That’s legally and factually correct.
There’s no lie in the bolded part though lol. He was told what he had to do or he could be charged. That means that if he doesn’t do it, he can be charged.
The police didn’t lie to him. Those are what he had to do if he didn’t want to be charged.
What part do you think is a lie?
Read it again. It’s not my job to educate you. Especially not if you’re being wilfully ignorant.
Which part do you think is a lie? The police were right.
FFS if you’re going to continue being this much of a fuckwit and/or idiot I’m done with this conversation.
Where’s the lie? He was told he had to do the stat Dec and name a person, and that if he couldn’t name the person then he could be charged. That’s legally and factually correct.
Again - where’s the lie?
Wrong
Why won’t you answer the question?
Where is the lie in what they said?
Read the fucking comment you fucking turd.
I even went to the effort of bolding the relevant section for you.
There’s no lie in the bolded part though lol. He was told what he had to do or he could be charged. That means that if he doesn’t do it, he can be charged.
Again - what lie did the police tell?