• pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they couldn’t stop any prior president from starting a war, then why would Trump be any different.

    This will never be declared a ‘war’ legally by the US government, because those require congressional approval. It will instead be a ‘military operation’, just like the Iraq War, Desert Storm 2, Afghanistan, Libya and pretty much all major military engagements since WW2.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      the Department of War does not do war, only military operations! that would be a good joke if people wouldn’t be dying

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah it’s Monty python level worplay shit, but sadly that’s what passes for skirting the law successfully in the USA.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Wild how the small innovation of just changing terminology completely allowed presidents to get around the law.

      Under Obama, civilians became: “Enemy or Unarmed Combatants”. Under Bush, torture became “enhanced interrogation” and kidnapping became “extraordinary rendition”. Under Clinton war became “peacekeeping operation”. They all loved using the term “air strike” instead of “bombing” or “settlers” instead of “murderers and rapists”.

      I hate that it works, but it works.