Your anecdotal evidence is worthless in the face of actual lost elections and policy changes reflecting the extreme unpopularity that Donald has built among both parties’ voters.

Ask Barack Obama. He could have put a stop to all this by passing a few laws when he had a supermajority.

Instead, he doubled down.

People keep saying this.

It’s like you’ve slept through every election since 2024, you know, the ones where overwhelmingly Donald’s candidates are losing by double digits despite the fact that he won said districts by double digits in 2024.

Hell, voters have abandoned Donald to such a degree that they quit with the gerrymandering push, as they can’t accurately predict where they will have support now.

Factually incorrect.

Donald did promise an immigration crackdown. He did not promise Gestapo-ing legal citizens. This person has every right to be pissed.

That is not a man.

That is quite a collection of utterly useless and evil morherfuckers.

It was designed to handle one party: rich, white landowners. That’s very plain in our founding documents, and why the power of the people is so tightly constrained. And it wasn’t long after that found that Washington himself set our military on our own discontented farmers.

If you honestly think that, you need to maybe read a bit more or work on your short-term memory, because you have no idea what you’re talking about. Hell, the last assassination attempt was just a few weeks ago.

Oh it garnered remarks, all right.

Sadly, that’s all it garnered. The US has a three-branch government symbolically only, and our only real power as a people is local.

Depends on whether she’s opining privately or publicly.

Privately she’s said some pretty awful things about him that are absolutely deserved. But in public, she recanted and lined up behind him, which is really disappointing. She could have been helpful to stopping his appointment but now she’s party not only to murders happening globally, but the deaths of American reservists who shouldn’t be at war in the first place.

I just assume they’re under contract to surveill everyone.

Bummer that the voters never held anyone accountable for the ‘Patriot’ Act.

Yeah, really hate the cruelty of my country.

For half the cost we could be dropping food, clothing, water, and medicine on the people we’re bombing and it would do much more to further the cause of peace.

I don’t think it will work out that way, but I think we’ll find out, unfortunately.

deleted by creator

No, he won’t.

He’ll exploit it to consolidate more power within the office of the President, just like Bush did after 9/11. An attack on US soil, historically, has prompted the American people to line up behind the American president for even the most horrific shit, like torture, state-sponsored kidnapping, mass surveillance without a warrant, black sites in other countries, etc. etc. etc.

Donald will love it when we get attacked, because not only will he be able to become a true dictator, but the people will be begging him to do it. (Not me, at least, but the majority will.)

It’s nice to see at least one country isn’t allowing terrorists to hide behind the concept of free speech. :)

Coming soon to American soil, I wager. I wonder if they’ll refer to this as a war when that happens?

LOL, if there’s one thing our ruling parties love, it’s letting supposed law enforcers kill citizens.

It’s a feature of the American experience, not a bug.

The satellite images aligned very well with the school’s location, so they couldn’t really deny it.

When has the human race ever cared about a genocide, absent some material reason to do so?