• nothingcorporate@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    8 gb of RAM shared between the gpu and the rest of the system… My 2 year old phone has 50% more.

    This is a POS to distract from the fact that their existing cheapest laptop just jumped form $899 to $1099

  • LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    $600 MacBook in 2026 is absolutely insane to me. Around 2007/08 when I started using MacBooks as a student the entry level ones used to be 1200€.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Powered by A18 Pro

    Completing the MacBook Neo experience is macOS Tahoe

    Woah, this is new! A version of Mac OSX running on a iPhone/iPad CPU.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        If its the full macOS, I don’t think we can say that. That’s what makes this so interesting as it is a first of its kind.

        Now, if it performs like a dog compared to an equivalent spec M3 or M4 Macbook Air, then we probably could call it a glorified tablet.

  • banshee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m not mad about this, especially with Google pushing Gemini so hard on all their devices. I pulled up the Chromebook site to see their current offerings, and the prominent advertisement for Gemini is pretty disgusting after fresh news of another death.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Apple has been violating people’s wallets for how long and they finally decide now is the time to make affordable macs?

    Complaining aside, this is a darn good move. The timing is great, so they are likely to be very popular too, which is good for the future of the market. I hope.

    • worhui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They have had an ‘affordable’ Mac for a lot of their history. The Mac mini was a downright value for a while. They have had near $1000 laptops for most of my memory.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s a big circle jerk. One day we suddenly hate Netflix. The next day Apple has always been terrible. Nobody cares about the complaints that are doing actual harm.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Honestly this seems absolutely incredible for the vast majority of people, a good MacBook at a decent price point. Benchmarks haven’t come out yet but I heard its as good if not better than the M1. For the vast majority of people that’s good enough, and even with the worse battery the real world battery life is gonna be amazing.

    Also for those complaining about Linux support the main competition is Windows laptops running Snapdragon X Elite which should have somewhat similar performance and also doesn’t support Linux. Hell the snapdragon x2 probably won’t support Linux either. These laptops cost two times as much as this and usually with significantly worse build quality.

  • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s pretty. But I recently bought a Lenovo IdeaPad at Costco for less, with 16GB ram and 1TB SDD and am running Linux Mint on it, which I’m getting way more out of than any other Mac I’ve owned.

    Without a doubt the Mac’s screen is better than mine. But I feel like, all things considered, what I have can do more (and probably for longer). I’m happy to see something like this come along and take the wind out of Microslop’s sails (and sales). At the same time, I feel like one is able to get far more value out of a less-costly machine. If one were going to switch OSes anyway, why not Linux? I guess they’re banking on people already owning iPhones and therefore making this a more seamless transition or whatever…

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I would be kinda impressed that Apple is finally offering something that’s good value, but 8GB of RAM? ehhhhhh. It’s probably still a decent-ish deal, I don’t really know how good a phone SoC would handle anything more than light tasks, though.

  • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Not usually an Apple guy, but it’s hard to overstate how smart it is to focus on affordability right now. I feel like having a ~$500 device in the current market is so important. (Especially if it respects your privacy.)

    This is the opposite of “own nothing and be happy” and I suspect these things are gonna sell like hotcakes.

    Now we just need to get Linux going on them. 🫡

    • bonenode@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I know you didn’t mean it like that, but at $599 it is not a “$500 device”. It is a $600 device. Which maybe isn’t much worse but still quite a price difference.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Also microcenter usually sells apple products at the student price to non students too

          • keckbug@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            Hell, Apple themselves usually sell Apple products at the student price to non-students, as long as you nod and wink when you click the Checkout button.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Macs do not respect your privacy. In comparison to windows it’s better but they still log and send every application you open to Apple.

      • enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Let’s stop perfect getting in the way of better.

        For the threat models and data harvesting the general consumer (i.e. our moms) will face, MacOS does a far better job than Windows and iOS far better than Android (and no, your mom isn’t actually using a pixel with Graphene. Maybe she could, but she isn’t. Not really.)

        If Apple can’t satisfy your threat model and privacy posturing, fine. But don’t assume everyone’s requirements are the same as yours, that’s how we scare people away.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          indeed does seem to be false.

          That’s from 5 years ago. Let’s look what Apple themselves say about that topic:

          Personal Data Apple Collects from You

          Usage Data. Data about your activity on and use of our offerings, such as app launches within our services, including browsing history; search history; product interaction; crash data, performance and other diagnostic data; and other usage data

          https://www.apple.com/legal/privacy/en-ww/

          • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            this is HIGHLY misleading. The page you linked is for Apple’s global/web properties (hence “within our services”); device-level settings govern app and OS telemetry separately. You can opt out of telemetry on apple devices you own.

        • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I am not ever trusting a proprietary OS, specially when it has been actively advertised as “caring about your privacy”

  • BladeFederation@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You known what, good job Apple. You’ve been winning me over lately. I’m not sure I’d exactly recommend this route to people, the 8 GB RAM is rough even with macOS being more efficient with it. But in the RAM-pocalypse we’ll take what we can get, and the rest is fire for budget range.

  • Thoralf@discuss.familie-will.at
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If it wouldn’t carry just 8 GB of RAM, it would be a great deal. Sadly, it’s not even upgradable, so its usefulness is rather limited.

  • popcar2@piefed.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Honestly I’m expecting this to take up most of the mid-range laptop market. 8gb RAM and only 256GB storage is lame, but the rest of it probably makes it really good value (especially with components getting more expensive recently).

    Unless you’re buying used or refurbished, most laptops I found at ~$600 or less kinda suck. Either it has terrible specs, or uses cheap plastic, or has a terrible screen, etc.

    I don’t like Apple, but hopefully this is a wake-up call for other vendors. Lower end laptops should stop being cheap garbage.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      14 hours ago

      makes it really good value

      An iPad Air costs the same but comes with a much better M4 processor. The main difference is a less crap operating system in macOS.

      • popcar2@piefed.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        An iPad Air costs the same but comes with a much better M4 processor.

        Sure, but a tablet isn’t a laptop.

        • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 hours ago

          You can’t really use an iPad as a laptop. The hardware exists and should work, but the software is awful.

          It’s often several seconds to switch to Safari on my iPad Pro with M series chip. We’ve had app switching in computers for 40 years. Why can’t iPad do it?

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Sure, but a tablet isn’t a laptop.

          So form factor, not hardware internals should be the deciding factor in cost?

          • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            To a degree, yeah.

            The laptop form factor is engineered with lid and palmrest assemblies, if you’re going to compare the two then you’ll want to add a nice keyboard to that iPad. Apple’s is $270.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Apple’s is $270.

              Typical Apple tax, completely unrelated to the few dollars a keyboard costs to make for real.

              • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                You’re not entirely wrong, in that the Apple Tax is real.

                Nonetheless, the quality of the Magic Keyboard is substantially higher than that of a keyboard you can get for “few dollars”

                Ultimately, your assertion was:

                An iPad Air costs the same but comes with a much better M4 processor. The main difference is a less crap operating system in macOS.

                An iPad Air with a keyboard that matches the form factor and build quality of a MacBook Neo does not actually cost the same, it costs an additional $270.

                • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  The MacBook doesn’t have a touchscreen. It cancels the keyboard cost out.

                  They don’t even put touch ID on the entry model.

      • irate944@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Better specs sure, but I would sooner cut my wrists than to try to work on an iOS device

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        In addition to being more locked down, you’d also have to figure out/purchase peripherals like the keyboard and mouse yourself, right?

      • MurrayL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Except for them to be directly comparable you’d also have to get a keyboard cover for the iPad, making it more expensive than the MacBook, and it’d still have one fewer USB port and no audio jack.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Except for them to be directly comparable you’d also have to get a keyboard cover for the iPad, making it more expensive than the MacBook

          One has a keyboard (cheap components), the other has a touchscreen. The cost cancel each other out.

    • BladeFederation@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      That is so true, and can’t be underestimated. The budget laptop market absolutely blows these days. I got a 1300x768 screen, 8 GB RAM, 1 TB storage (albeit HDD), and ~2 GHz CPU in 2016, for $500. That was at Best Buy, who tried to sell $100 HDMI cables at the time, and wasn’t even a great deal, though I was fine with it.

      Now the budget market is…pretty much the same. Slightly better 1080p screen, same RAM, 1/4th the storage (but usually an SSD), a significantly better CPU that has most of that CPU progress kneecapped by Windows 11. It’s GRIM out there.

    • homes@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s important to note, and is often overlooked, that macOS is especially good at memory management. That 8 GB will go much farther than it would on it another PC. Not to mention that the vast majority of people using these will be using it to browse the web and other very minor tasks. For the price, it’s pretty great.

      • djdarren@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I have an 8GB M1 mini in service as my Home Assistant server. 4GB to UTM to run HAOS, the rest for macOS and Ollama running a small LLM for speech to text. I’m genuinely amazed that it hasn’t fallen over. Tried the same thing in Asahi but without macOS’ memory management and access to GPU acceleration, it just wasn’t feasible.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Tried the same thing in Asahi but without macOS’ memory management and access to GPU acceleration, it just wasn’t feasible.

          Thank you for sharing this result. I knew Asahi’s memory management wasn’t as robust (so I got a 24GB RAM M2 unit to overcome this).

          For your macOS Ollama implementation are you able to leverage the NPU in the hardware (which I know is also unavailable so far in Asahi)?

      • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Additionally Apple has a bunch of cloud storage deals. I think most people store all of their photos and videos in iCloud which for most people is the majority of their storage space. I bet this is right in the sweet spot for usability, which doesn’t surprise me given Apple’s laptop history

          • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            They were also talking about using it to browse the web and for very minor tasks, which is relevant.

          • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Right, but storage and memory are clearly the bottlenecks on this computer and we’re pointing out how Apple is alleviating those bottlenecks

      • kingofras@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Eh. 8GB is unified memory, meaning it also needs to carry the graphics load. You’re making it sound like it is just working memory. MacOS is also more graphics heavy than PC, especially Linux based OS, so whatever efficiency you’ll get from the OS in terms of memory compression and management, you’ll also have to offer for the smooth expose, missing control and all the frosted glass translucent garbage they force on the users.

        8GB is shit low. Email and browsing, ok. But as soon as you have 40 tabs open in chrome, it will be email or browsing. Garageband sure, again dont run anything else in the background. But I doubt you’ll even be able to edit a 1080p project in iMovie without stutter on battery power. The biggest issue is that you can’t upgrade it, so whatever software upgrades happen, 8GB is all you’ll ever get.

        • DireTech@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Ok at this point it’s been 5 years since the M1 and it’s crazy people are still acting like 8GB is unusable on them. My work Mac is 8GB. So is my wife’s. I run Xcode, iOS simulator, safari, VSCode and the corporate security software at the same time without issue.

          Would I want that little for video games? Hell no.

          It’s still fine for the typical user. As a developer, I find the base 256GB far more of an issue since it’s impossible for me to fit multiple versions of Xcode and simulators on it simultaneously.

          • kingofras@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            This is a step backwards from M1 in terms of cores, core speed and bus speed. This is not going to feel like an m1 base even.

            • DireTech@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              We’ll see when the reviews hit. It’d be pretty dumb for it to be worse than an M1 when older airs get discounted down to similar prices.

        • homes@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I seriously doubt many people using this will be doing much video editing with 40 tabs open. Your expectations are unrealistic for the type of user who will be buying these.

    • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Agree. Probably best notebook for students and also for smaller companies, if you’re not relying on high end hardware.

    • ComputerAbuser@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      8GB RAM and 256GB SSD isn’t great, but it’s not surprising at this price point with the price of memory and storage right now. Anyone who has built a system recently can attest. If RAM/SSD pricing wasn’t so god awful I could imagine double the capacity at this price point.

    • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Honestly, it might be a wakeup call for laptop vendors, or it might just put a lot of them out of business. This is not a good economy for them to suddenly have to compete with Apple on value…

    • deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I got a laptop from 2017 off eBay for $50 with those same specs. Installed Linux on it and it was good to go. 600 is absolutely outrageous in a world where used hardware exists.

        • deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          No, 8gb of RAM (obviously older DDR but still) and 256gb or storage.

          Of course the CPU and other older components will be less powerful, but like… What do we use computers for now that we didn’t in 2017? AI? Oh nooooo, what will I ever do without local AI… It all works the same, at a pretty decent speed running Bazzite (cause I wanted to see how it ran games. It topped out at Skyrim Special Edition running at 15fps, did good at fallout New Vegas though).

          I got a bargain, but say you can only get it now for double what I paid. That’s 1/6 the price. Why pay 600% more for a computer that’s not even that much better?

  • fuzzywombat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Considering Windows has become a complete dumpster fire recently, this $600 laptop could be a really appealing option for some if they’re mostly browsing the web.

    • FireWire400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’d make for a great student laptop, reminds me of the old polycarbonate MacBooks actually. They did cut corners a lot, but retained all the niceties you’d expect from a MacBook.

      And they finally added some colour; could’ve have gone with more vibrant colours IMO but it’s better than nothing.

      I gotta say, I do like fuzzy wombats as well^^

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So at this price point, there’s basically no reason to ever buy a Windows PC at all.

          • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That doesnt mean the average person can just use Linux, you cant even buy a laptop with Linux from a standard store that people typically look for laptops in (like Amazon or best buy). If you have to convince people to go to a separate website, manually enter their card details, and pay a shipping fee of $116 along with import fees (yes this is a bit more specific to Tuxedo but my point stands). Regardless of which Linux brand you buy it typically takes 3-5 weeks for shipping. Meanwhile across the board the base price of Linux laptops are always higher than Windows devices (some OEMs like Lenovo hide this by giving a $100 discount but when you consider that Linux is generally only an option for custom orders the total cost is still higher than a non custom standard windows laptop).

            • BladeFederation@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Which is why you buy a Windows machine, then put Linux on it. You said there’s no reason to buy a Windows machine. Even if you abandon Windows forever, there’s still a reason to buy it. There are use cases that Apple silicon is not good for, like gaming. And having competition is good.

              Kind of a weird example to say that people won’t online shop too. That’s far more common for all types of people than walking into a store is these days.

        • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          On some Mac books. With limitations.

          It’s an amazing project, but outsiders might overestimate it’s status if you say it that way.

          This one will not even boot in a long time.