• venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Electric vehicle are major culprits, no? They literally weigh tons more than ICE, a lot more friction between rubber and road and therefore more tire wear?

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s a little trickier than that. My Mustang MachE weighs about 4900lbs. The Ford Escape, a similar vehicle by the same manufacturer weighs 3300lbs, so my EV is about 1.5 times more car than the ICE equivalent. However, my car uses regenerative braking, and there is a huge reduction in brake dust from EVs, which some quick googling says can make up to 55% of non-emmission related airborne particulate matter in urban areas. Not to mention that the EV releases 0% (or maybe like 30% depending on the power infrastructure) of the “tail pipe” emissions of a comparable ICE car.

      It’s all kinda moot since the majority of brake dust and tire particulates come from the 80,000lb semi trucks.

      I’m not doing a deep dive on any of the particulate emissions listed. It’s a complex field, and I’d consider those numbers as “factoids at best” but it a least gives us a ballpark number.

      • venusaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Then you gotta ask yourself how you’d compare microplastics vs other types of pollution.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Tricky question, gets back to the whole, “I’m a part time internet shit poster and not a pollution expert” bit. I think that the impacts of microplastic pollution is serious and needs to be reduced where possible and regulated when it can’t be reduced. I also think that the concern about MPs is valid and serious, but a bit overblown. I’ll leave you with the last bit to think about as well: There will never be another person born on this planet without microplastics in their body.

          • venusaur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            There’s always a trade-off of harm humans are causing themselves and the planet. My hope is that one day we are plastic and we will be enriching ourselves instead.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      If they’re using the stock low rolling resistance tires, there’s actually less friction.

      Not to say that’s necessarily a good thing, since it’s easier to spin the tires with all the extra ev torque.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The computer stops you from spinning the wheels. I chirped the tires on my CRZ making a measly 150lb-ft way more than I’ve ever chirped my MachE GT at 600lb-ft…which is 0 times. I think most the tire wear is going to come from turning/cornering in this case.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Lol the 80kw motor in my Ford c-max chirps the tires every 3rd takeoff, and like 90% of the time when roads are moist. Could just be because my model is a compliance car, but the traction control suuuucks.

      • mjr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        You don’t have to floor the pedal every time. Maybe they should only unlock max torque on kick down.