• Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    8 days ago

    Perhaps they should’ve ran this article through an LLM aswell to at least try and hide the glaringly obvious bias.

    Just give me the facts and let me make up my own mind about how I feel of something.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      LLMs don’t create objectivity, so if you’re looking for “facts,” you’ll have to actually engage your brain.

      • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I was facetiously suggesting they use one to hide the bias already baked into the article - not to add anything that isn’t there.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          OP’s article is true. Did you accidentally click an Eli Yudkowsky article in your bookmarks?

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        That name is what initially put me off, but they actually seem to have some decent takes.

        • BilSabab@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          It is one of the better tech news sites out there. Their newsletter is very good and got these silly headlines that never fail to crack me up.