• kernelle@0d.gs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    All the time, then people get ran around in circles, are given a too technical explanation and give up more often than not.

    The encryption is not inherently a bad thing, but forcing people into account creation is where the trouble starts. With piss-poor customer support as the cherry on top, this should never be allowed.

    • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’d say it’s a bad thing because it’s the wrong threat model as a default.

      More home users are in scenarios like “I spilled a can of Diet Sprite into my laptop, can someone yank the SSD and recover my cat pictures” than “Someone stole my laptop and has physical access to state secrets that Hegseth has yet to blurt on Twitch chat”. Encryption makes the first scenario a lot harder to easily recover from, and people with explicit high security needs should opt into it or have organization-managed configs.

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        “Someone stole my laptop and has physical access to state secrets that Hegseth has yet to blurt on Twitch chat”.

        Thanks for making me laugh. It’s been a while.

      • kernelle@0d.gs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I agree, the encryption should be deliberate choice. And we’ve said nothing yet about the impact on performance.

        You used to almost be forced to make a recovery CD or USB when encrypting a drive, now people don’t even know how ‘important’ the MS account actually is.