It literally is when it’s targeting anyone but white men.
Removing outdated information from a website is censorship because it “targets” anyone but white men? What? The DEI programs no longer exist, so the government removed the information about the DEI programs. That makes sense no matter how you feel about the DEI programs ending. If it doesn’t exist, you remove the info about it.
Are you trying to argue that ending DEI programs is “censorship”? That’s an entirely different argument, and “censorship” isn’t even remotely the right word for it.
Oh, you actually believe this?
Believe that you’re just saying I’m “trolling” because you disagree with me? Yes, I believe that because that’s what you’re doing. You haven’t shown any evidence of me “trolling” because I’m not. We’re having a discussion, or at least I’m trying to. It seems to me like you’re trying to get my opinion and views censored by calling them “trolling”, and I’m assuming you’re also reporting my comments as such too right?
The DEI programs no longer exist, so the government removed the information about the DEI programs. That makes sense no matter how you feel about the DEI programs ending. If it doesn’t exist, you remove the info about it.
why?
You haven’t shown any evidence of me “trolling” because I’m not.
I know, I apologized, this is so much more sad that you’re serious
It seems to me like you’re trying to get my opinion and views censored by calling them “trolling”, and I’m assuming you’re also reporting my comments as such too right?
you don’t know what censure is, and no I’m not reporting you.
Why…what? Why would they remove the information about programs that no longer exist? Because they no longer exist. The information is no longer relevant, and leaving it up would only cause confusion.
you don’t know what censure is, and no I’m not reporting you.
CenSURE and cenSOR are very different things. Are you claming that the removal of the DEI stuff from the government websites is censuring or censoring?
Why…what? Why would they remove the information about programs that no longer exist? Because they no longer exist. The information is no longer relevant, and leaving it up would only cause confusion
Uhuh, but why?
CenSURE and cenSOR are very different things. Are you claming that the removal of the DEI stuff from the government websites is censuring or censoring?
Removing outdated information from a website is censorship because it “targets” anyone but white men? What? The DEI programs no longer exist, so the government removed the information about the DEI programs. That makes sense no matter how you feel about the DEI programs ending. If it doesn’t exist, you remove the info about it.
Are you trying to argue that ending DEI programs is “censorship”? That’s an entirely different argument, and “censorship” isn’t even remotely the right word for it.
Believe that you’re just saying I’m “trolling” because you disagree with me? Yes, I believe that because that’s what you’re doing. You haven’t shown any evidence of me “trolling” because I’m not. We’re having a discussion, or at least I’m trying to. It seems to me like you’re trying to get my opinion and views censored by calling them “trolling”, and I’m assuming you’re also reporting my comments as such too right?
why?
I know, I apologized, this is so much more sad that you’re serious
you don’t know what censure is, and no I’m not reporting you.
Why…what? Why would they remove the information about programs that no longer exist? Because they no longer exist. The information is no longer relevant, and leaving it up would only cause confusion.
CenSURE and cenSOR are very different things. Are you claming that the removal of the DEI stuff from the government websites is censuring or censoring?
Uhuh, but why?
Censors can censure.
Ok so there’s no point for me trying to continue this discussion with you as you clearly aren’t arguing in good faith. See ya.
Right back at ya