• potustheplant@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “Not quire as bad”? My dude, you have to ask for permission from a corporation to install an app on your phone that you supposedly own and paid for. On what planet is this not awful?

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      This is happening to PCs now too, eg. with the OS ‘age-gating’ laws that IMO only exist to quell competition for MS, Google, and Apple.

    • 007Ace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It looks like a glorified ‘developer mode’ switch that has the 1 day wait to prevent someone from grabbing your phone, turning on sideloading, installing some hazardous app, and then having their way with your info. This appears to be the best of both worlds.

      Like when unlocking your bootloader wiped your info. Just do it first. not a year in to using your device, if thats your plan.

      • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        43 minutes ago

        Lmfao. I’ll invent a better way and it will only take me negative 50 years to do it.

        Passcode.

        There is absolutely nothing positive about this. It is only nefarious, full stop. I could open a million dollar restaurant that served microwaved cat shit, but on the menu it’s called “Tbone Steak” and with your logic, people wouldn’t notice the difference.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          Okay, pump the breaks a second.

          I agree a day wait is bullshit, but you think a passcode is enough to keep someone from… anything? You can shoulder surf a passcode in no time at all. Hell, it’s not even difficult. Go to a bar, talk someone up, give a legit reason to use someone’s phone, intentionally lock and force a passcode and 99% of people at bars will put their pin in within eyesight, or tell you the code.

          A passcode isn’t as big a deterrent as most people seem to think it is. It’ll keep you out of an unattended phone you found, but there are plenty of ways to socially engineer your way into having it for the vast majority of targets.

          And yes, you likely wouldn’t give your passcode out. But this is how a number of ne’er-do-wells got unfettered access to hundreds of iPhones, and prompted Apple to put a semi similar 24 hour lock on certain security actions if you aren’t in a “known to the phone” location (somewhere you frequent like home or work).

        • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          Technically installing an app allows continuous spying instead of one-time offloading. It’s an actual consideration with spyware like Pegasus: it might’ve been used as a bug to listen to offline conversations.

      • CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Sure. Because as we know people grabbing your unlocked phone to sideload apps onto it is an almost daily occurrence. Which of us hasn’t had a stranger install a cryto miner while we looked away for a second.

        Get real. This is an imaginary problem affecting the 0.01% they are using to tell you this action is justifiable. Getting more control is the aim of their game

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh yeah, because those guys seriously can’t wait a day

        This has nothing to do with security