• 1 Post
  • 1.16K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle






  • Yep, pretty much

    Once trump is gone (and he will be, soon enough) can we please:

    a) Put a boat load of restrictions on religions. Churches and religions pay taxes, period. They can’t break any human rights, they can’t have any of their materials in any school, or even be talked about, unless if to teach about the horrors and plain stupidity of religions.

    b) place a hard cap on personal wealth. Create a load more tax brackets that also keep personal wealth into account and anything over a million goes 100% to taxes. No. More. Millionaires. The world would be such a better place. Governments would get boat loads of money for projects, free healthcare, free education, free public transport, universal basic income…


  • Has she?

    I’m not really into celebrity worshipping but the little I know of her, she only did a jeans commercial that started all this. I doubt that the commercial was her idea, this was a marketing agency that came up with the idea, the concept, the things that should be said and she was hired as an actress to say it.

    I’ve seen quite a few actors say or do things in commercials that they normally wouldn’t do or say themselves

    In not trying to defend her, I’m no fan, I just think (unless there is way more that I’m not aware of) that the hatred towards her is a little bit over the top


  • Transvestigation

    Why, just why. Certain words should never have been invented, why was this one?

    Even if she is trans (she’s not) who fucking cares? It’s nine none of your goddamn business, and again, who cares, and why care? If she’s trans, well good on her because she looks great, but who caaaaaarres?

    And even if you’d care at all, why care so much to spend time on it at all?

    I can only imagine that secretly these guys hope she’s trans because secretly they’re gay but two guys kissing is yucky to them, so a beautiful girl with a penis would be awesome for them.

    That’s literally the only way that this nonsense makes any sense to me

    Edit: fixed typo





  • In a direct confrontation, the US would walk over them as if they aren’t there. That’s why you don’t do that, you apply guerilla tactics. That’s why a bunch of basically goat herders in Afghanistan, of all places, managed to beat the Russians and the Americans.

    Let there be no doubt, the US got its ass handed there, and Afghanistan is a good part of the reasons why the USSR folded.

    I assume the Danish generals know this and likely have prepared something similar, but now with highly trained and well equipped soldiers.

    I think an invasion of Greenland would finish the US, especially since the Danes have a lot of experience in how to fight winter conditions while the US not so much.

    I think something similar applies as well in, for example, Mexico. There are boat loads of highly (US military) trained criminals over there with a lot of experience in sending messages. Once the hundredth soldier was found dangling from a bridge, or cut up in a salad, it might become hard to explain to Maga base why really is worth it.

    The US is awesome at invading. It absolutely sucks at keeping anything



  • Nah, AI will already do that automatically because any and all system loses something in inefficiencies. Same like if you put a theoretical 100 miles of gas worth in your tank that turns into 20 in practice because the combustion engine has an efficiency of 30ish%, you have air and tire resistance, etc etc.

    AI has the same for information, and what comes out is always a certain fraction of the 100% that went in

    Since poisoning the pool makes AI unreliable up to the point where it becomes useless, it has the potential to stop the AI madness. I’d be all for that.