• lettruthout@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I was going to suggest charging the company an exorbitant fee for each incident but your idea is better.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 hours ago

        win-win, tow companies fill their lots with waymo, people from waymo need to come get the car, pay hundreds in cash (because all those places are cash only) there’s no room in the lot for normal tows.

        The passengers should get free rides for a year.

        • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What do you mean they’re cash only? I’ve paid by card (credit card even) to have my car towed when it just died while sitting in traffic, and again when I needed to move a tool box. What in the world?

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            You weren’t paying to get your car back. Different kind of towing.

            • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              58 minutes ago

              In plenty of places (in the US) it’s the exact same companies doing both. Mack Towing is a pretty good example. The police where I live use them to tow vehicles that are illegal parked or considered abandoned. Those places charge a fee ($400 per day) to the person who owns the vehicle and the fee must be paid before the vehicle will be returned to the customer. They really don’t only deal in cash (although I can understand why they might not take credit card payments in this eventuality because of the risk of a chargeback).

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Imagine dying in a house fire because the fire fighters were on the opposite side of town taking a traffic cone off of the hood of a robot taxi when the call came in.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is a good argument for actual robotaxis that aren’t just cars with extra servos and sensors bolted on.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    52 minutes ago

    They see themselves as infrastructure, so then this makes sense. They want to install themselves into our life.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    But this was not an isolated incident. Waymo has relied on taxpayer-funded first responders to navigate its vehicles when they encounter issues, despite the existence of the company’s own roadside assistance team. In at least six instances identified by TechCrunch, first responders have had to take control of Waymo vehicles and move them out of traffic during emergency situations, including one in which an officer was in the middle of responding to a mass shooting.

  • albert_inkman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The image of firefighters rescuing robotaxis is perfect. We build these systems to be fully autonomous but then the whole time there are humans on standby, paid to bail out when the AI hesitates.

    Self-driving is like the rest of modern tech. We sell it as magic, then quietly patch the gaps with human labor. But at least this is honest about it. The companies know who is really keeping these things moving.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I thought Waymo was the one using overseas drivers to help when needed?

    I’m looking forward to the schadenfreude when all this stupid “AI” shit finally blows up.