The video I linked for reference

I guess I was “sympathizing with invaders” because I said “Such an absolute waste of life, just for the vanity of one man.”

Just patently ridiculous moderation…

  • Rose@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    On the one hand, the post is consistent with the other posts seen in the community, like the daily summaries (e.g. here) or this post saying “Russian losses surge”. However, your comment was probably unnecessary and indeed contrary to the first rule (“🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.”). There are many in Russia who sign contracts as opposed to being conscripted, and even if they get conscripted, they can refuse to serve and do time in prison, which is still the lesser evil than killing others for absolutely no reason. Moreover, if it were merely Putin’s war, it wouldn’t fully explain the wide support for the invasion or the mass atrocities and war crimes committed by the so-called regular soldiers. We could go into why people commit crime and how it relates to poverty and other systemic issues stemming from hierarchies of power, but the Ukraine community is not the right place for that, as the Russian problems are a remote concern compared to those of the Ukrainian people attacked by Russia.

    Edit: Fixed a typo.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Sorry but saying that Russians casualties are a waste of life is not sympathy. It’s humanity. This dehumanization people support is not healthy.

      Edit : not to mention they could have asked me to edit instead of removing the whole post

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        i think not enough people understand there’s a difference between empathy and sympathy. i can look at the russian soldiers and have empathy for that they are poorly educated, exist in a constant media environment that tells them that they need to be scared of all Ukrainians, and that often they are poor and desperate and think they are doing what they need just to survive.

        this does not mean i sympathize with them. it just means i’m trying to take the effort to understand how a fellow human could have turned out this wrong. i largely do so to make sure i don’t let the children around me become the next generation of uninformed, easily maniputed, violent masses it requires to carry out atrocity.

        in case it isn’t clear to anyone reading this comment,

        • empathy: the ability to analyze and understand how someone came to be
        • sympathy: the act of adopting or co-signing someone elses thoughts, positions, or actions
      • Encephalotrocity@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Let’s reframe this entire argument from another perspective so you can maybe be a little objective:

        Imagine if I posted an article/blog arguing something along the lines of ‘with the land war in Iran the Israeli military losses have spiked 20%.’ and concluded with “Such an absolute waste of life, just for the vanity of two men.", in r/Palestine. How much help do you think the “I’m just being careful not to dehumanize them” narrative would be? Do you think their mods would simply ask me to edit the comment?

          • Rose@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Does Lemmy even allow community mods to remove a post, ask a question, then restore it, like on reddit? If so, yeah, I’d suggest they try that at times, but I’d view them not doing that in this scenario as an imperfection rather than a form of power abuse.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              I mean, it’s not exactly a critical statement, yanno? Putting a distinguished comment and waiting a few hours before removing is also an option

              • Rose@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think that, and even the expectation for them to do more than to remove (and let you repost with corrections), rests on the notion of your comment not being in violation of the rules, which is obviously in dispute here.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Even with rule violations, there’s gradients. One can ask one to fix a mild rule violation in a nicer manner. I would know, I do it all the time.

                  • Rose@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    If it were a less sensitive issue, from the backseat I’d probably agree that the 24 hour ban was excessive, as it left no room for reposting with corrections from what looked like an otherwise well-intentioned post. If you reposted without corrections or posted anything else that’s in violation of the rules, then I’d probably ban.