You are deflecting from my points by appealing to a list of specific references to tooling when that doesn’t address my actual point.
These are all lossy data compression algorithms trained on sets of human curated data created by humans. Sure you can make some use of them, but they are massively inefficient from almost every angle versus humans creating tutorials, humans creating project templates and easy to understand user interfaces, humans making teaching materials for other humans, humans answering questions on forums, humans just doing HUMAN things…
ANYTHING you argue as a pro for AI is just a poorly extracted benefit from a curated set of human data that could have been better leveraged by humans helping humans create new things directly.
You can hate AI all you want, but you sound uneducated af.
You have no idea what you’re talking about. The data YOU are missing is vast. The reason for this is you have no idea what it’s capable of beyond your current understanding.
You’re refusing to educate yourself to hold onto an idea… that’s cult behavior.
It’s fine to hate AI, but do it with education and you won’t come off like some Christian cultist
“I don’t have to know anything about AI to hate it. I have my beliefs and they are correct. No information exists beyond my beliefs. I have not attempted to gain any further understanding.”
Since you don’t use AI, you won’t be able to use an LLM to answer any of your questions.
So outline for me your understanding of how I could use artificial intelligence to make, for example, a 3-D movie similar to Pixar movies. Explain to me the process I would go through.
You are deflecting from my points by appealing to a list of specific references to tooling when that doesn’t address my actual point.
These are all lossy data compression algorithms trained on sets of human curated data created by humans. Sure you can make some use of them, but they are massively inefficient from almost every angle versus humans creating tutorials, humans creating project templates and easy to understand user interfaces, humans making teaching materials for other humans, humans answering questions on forums, humans just doing HUMAN things…
ANYTHING you argue as a pro for AI is just a poorly extracted benefit from a curated set of human data that could have been better leveraged by humans helping humans create new things directly.
You sound like you are in a cult.
You have no idea what you’re talking about. The data YOU are missing is vast. The reason for this is you have no idea what it’s capable of beyond your current understanding.
You’re refusing to educate yourself to hold onto an idea… that’s cult behavior.
It’s fine to hate AI, but do it with education and you won’t come off like some Christian cultist
How am I coming off like a cultist?
“I don’t have to know anything about AI to hate it. I have my beliefs and they are correct. No information exists beyond my beliefs. I have not attempted to gain any further understanding.”
Where in my comments have I said I don’t have to know anything about AI to hate it?
Where have I claimed maximally that no information exists beyond my beliefs?
You are Strawmanning me and it is blatant.
Since you don’t use AI, you won’t be able to use an LLM to answer any of your questions.
So outline for me your understanding of how I could use artificial intelligence to make, for example, a 3-D movie similar to Pixar movies. Explain to me the process I would go through.
Outline for me why that wouldn’t be a waste of time versus going straight to the tutorial videos and materials the AI stole the content from?
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury…. I rest my case.