Since you don’t use AI, you won’t be able to use an LLM to answer any of your questions.
So outline for me your understanding of how I could use artificial intelligence to make, for example, a 3-D movie similar to Pixar movies. Explain to me the process I would go through.
“I don’t have to know anything about AI to hate it. I have my beliefs and they are correct. No information exists beyond my beliefs. I have not attempted to gain any further understanding.”
You have no idea what you’re talking about. The data YOU are missing is vast. The reason for this is you have no idea what it’s capable of beyond your current understanding.
You’re refusing to educate yourself to hold onto an idea… that’s cult behavior.
It’s fine to hate AI, but do it with education and you won’t come off like some Christian cultist
Yeah, you’ve got no idea what AI is if you think the compression is out of the user’s control.
You should look at the PROFESSIONAL AI tools for video creation that involve an entire render process for the 3d scenes it makes, that import into apps like Blender, Maya, etc. Auto-rigging and motion generation basically allows anyone to make an entire movie.
You’ve shown you know nothing about AI beyond OpenAI’s consumer offerings.
You can hate AI all you want, but you sound uneducated af.
Sure it will. Give it a prompt and it does the work. Make the prompt original and it will be original. AI doesn’t choose the story… humans do.
I just don’t think you understand AI beyond chatbots and low effort memes.
Umm… just like Hollywood.
AI video won’t need Hollywood. Putting IP into it was a dumb idea. Mickey Mouse seductively polishing a candle stick? That’s not what they wanted, but that’s what they’d get.
When AI comes for movies, it’s going to show how crappy (most) movies already are.
Australia, Barbados, Bermuda, French Polynesia, Grenada, New Caledonia, Panama, Puerto Rico, Réunion, and the US Virgin Islands.
It probably had one. The software just probably sucks
I say we sacrifice one human for every fur
the Commission’s preliminary conclusion is that outright bans would carry “significant economic impacts” for the remaining fur-producing regions while failing to achieve the intended welfare gains if production simply shifts to third countries.
Someone’s gonna do it. Might as well be us.
Pebble better
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury…. I rest my case.