• Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I think it does. At least I kept hearing “als ich mein Zivi gemacht hab” when I lived there. Most people elect to serve in the form of civil service instead, but civil service is a type of military service (as weird as that sounds).

    But maybe it’s very easy avoiding the whole thing altogether? I don’t know all that precisely, really. My “military service” was done in the form of civil service in a children daycare centre by the time I moved to Germany. And I’ve never been a German citizen anyhow.

    • Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Yes that was the case until 2010/11ish, when we got rid of compulsory military/civil service. I still had to do it after finishing high school in 2010, but it was sort of not enforced anymore. People born a few months after myself, didn’t have to do anything anymore.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      And that’s how it should be! It should be mandatory, and we should have it in the US too. Two years once you turn 18. Get people out of their local bubbles and show them what the world is like, make them useful citizens.

      • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        USA is only waging wars of aggression. It would be horrible forcing people to that shit, IMO.

        In Finland or Germany it’s very different because our armies exist strictly for self defence. When the US military should see military action, is decided in D.C.

        But when the Finnish military should see military is decided in Moscow.

        If your wars are something you fan decide about, it would be extremely immoral having compulsory military service.

        In countries that cannot decide when to not have a war, it’s immoral to not have compulsory military service, as that would mean only the poorest having to bear the brunt of the war.

        • rzadkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          In Finland or Germany it’s very different because our armies exist strictly for self defence.

          How self defensive of them to occupy Afghanistan…

          • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            …and Iraq, true.

            Though, at least Finland sent the absolute minimum to both of those shitstorms, and that only after being blackmailed by USA. But zero conscripts were sent to either one. Especially the shit about Iraq is something I am really angry about.

      • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Weird how militarized nationalism still has any fans or supporters, but you do you I guess. I hope you’re glad your guy is in office.