themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoEU age verification app announced to protect children onlinewww.dw.comexternal-linkmessage-square170fedilinkarrow-up1397arrow-down113
arrow-up1384arrow-down1external-linkEU age verification app announced to protect children onlinewww.dw.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square170fedilink
minus-squareMrSulu@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·16 hours agoOh this sounds good… I missed reading the following essential requirements They achieved an unhackable system that also “air gaps” the information used to prove child ID from any external agent, including themselves So it will be pulled immediately if it fails or exposes any childs data Demonstrably withstands hacking? They have independent audit data? Clear accountability clearly laid out for data breaches, including criminal charges? Ministerial accountability?
minus-squareGreenBeanMachine@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-29 hours agoHacked in 2 minutes https://xcancel.com/Paul_Reviews/status/2044723123287666921
minus-squarelost_faith@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·9 hours agoadd a $5million payment to each individual affected by each breach
minus-squareCaptainSpaceman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·11 hours ago“This ship is Unhackable!” “Iceberg sized ransomware, dead ahead, sir!”
minus-squarematlag@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 hours agoSay you get all of that, you’d be willing to trust them? Security is a continuous battle in which the defender mostly try to make the hack not worthy. The most valuable the dataset, the more resources bad actors will be willing to spend on the hacking. A database of “everyone”? You can imagine the appeal! And accountability here means what? The gov gets a fine it pays to itself? A gov employee takes the blame, then what?
Oh this sounds good… I missed reading the following essential requirements
Hacked in 2 minutes
https://xcancel.com/Paul_Reviews/status/2044723123287666921
add a $5million payment to each individual affected by each breach
“This ship is Unhackable!”
“Iceberg sized ransomware, dead ahead, sir!”
Say you get all of that, you’d be willing to trust them? Security is a continuous battle in which the defender mostly try to make the hack not worthy.
The most valuable the dataset, the more resources bad actors will be willing to spend on the hacking.
A database of “everyone”? You can imagine the appeal!
And accountability here means what? The gov gets a fine it pays to itself? A gov employee takes the blame, then what?