The momentum is building for a social media ban for minors in one of the largest economies in the world.

  • troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Since absolutely no one has studied the tech before commenting.

    It’s:

    • Open source
    • Privacy protecting

    Carry on.

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Ignoring the desire for state control a moment.

    If they actually cared, they would spend the money on education and social services instead.

    The internet is already age-gated, children cannot buy an internet connection.

    It is adults who let them access it, unsupervised. Better parental controls and education/advice on how to use them is required for current and future parents.

    • doleo@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It is impossible for me to believe this has anything to do with protecting minors. None of these measures ever do.

    • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Bingo. Why do they need an Internet connected device at all? Give them a dumb phone, and if they use a computer put it in a public area when it is online. Problem solved.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Social media bad for kids but good for adults? Who the fuck are they trying to fool.

    I would gladly trade all social media for no age verification.

    We have a social media problem, not an age verification one.

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    China level surveilance is coming to EU. Scary times.

    It’s identical system to how China ties your identity to your online activity.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Bingo.

      It’s what all governments have been trying to do for decades.

      It’s part of why they’ve been trying to get rid of cash.

    • linule@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s not? I’ve not checked in depth yet, but it’s supposed to be privacy protecting, via cryptographic proofs. Also, it’s open source.

  • terabyterex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I was starting to switch over all my services to european based ones but thry actually might do this worse. At least in the us congress people will fight about it forever (or at leadt they used to)

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Self hosting is the only real solution apparently, anything else gives power to corporations/governments to abuse.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Its only a matter of time before they get Chat Control as well.

      Nowhere is safe anymore.

          • forestbeasts@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Not the good kind.

            Seriously, “just go outside” ignores that some people (like us) kinda need the internet to have community at all.

            (We’re furry, therian, and various other things. We can’t just pick up a magazine or whatever and get furry porn of the exact kinks we’re into. And even besides the whole porn thing. Also just, like… being able to talk to people. We need the internet for that, too.)

            – Frost

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      And it’s a lot harder to effectively enforce or combine with other services, such as ID, etc, because 50 states.

      Fed can only do so much, and it only takes one state fighting it to cause it to fail or at least become bogged down.

      • terabyterex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Right, and i think it might ve unconstitutional but i would like it not to pass at all the wait for it to be repealed

      • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I’m EU and we already have digital IDs in most countries, controlled by our governments and mandatory to access government and public administrations websites.

        These IDs don’t let websites collect more info that they already can without any IDs at all. If you think you’re protected form Meta/Google/Microsoft/whatever profiling you, your IP, geo-locating you if you use a phone, just because they don’t have your ID, I have a bridge to sell you.

        That’s not to say this thing is good, age-verification is bad and dangerous, they should educate people instead, both kids and parents. But having governments manage your ID is much less evil than giving it to private companies or baking it into an operating system.

        It all comes down on how they implement this app, and the code being opensource is a good thing.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Nope! This is cryptographically impossible. See Signals sealed sender. It only works because Signal doesn’t keep a map between account and the certs.