• 0 Posts
  • 646 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 2nd, 2025

help-circle















  • Yes.

    It eliminates risks.

    For example I have a proper NAS, a server with one large drive, and 2 external drives.

    Guess what I never have a problem with? The NAS or the internal drives. Occasionally one of the external drives will just disappear from the server, because they’re not really intended to be up 24/7. So I’ll have to power cycle it.

    Also those external drives don’t have any active cooling - they weren’t designed for that use case. So I’ve found they tend to get warm if I’m copying anything to them, and now have an old case fan on them. Talk about janky.





  • I couldn’t have written it better.

    The only disagreement I’d have is that Win2k was the major turning point when NT architecture hit mainstream. Suddenly we had NT core with a UI that users understood and dynamic events (PnP).

    Though for us in IT, NT4 was the major turning point - a solid OS that you could actually use in business.

    XP brought a lot more user functionality (plus better performance), and Windows 7 brought the current version of 64-bit architecture.

    Your point about working in the enterprise nails it - you simply can’t pivot just because “this is a better way”. Does the current shovel still dig a ditch? Then replacing all the shovels with this fancy new one that weighs 6oz less isn’t a useful way to expend resources (time/money/management overhead/etc).