cross-posted from: https://libretechni.ca/post/1263630

New York’s state budget could pass within days. Buried deep in the text is a provision that has nothing to do with balancing the books. Part C of the budget bill would require every 3D printer sold in New York to run surveillance software that scans every design file you create, and blocks anything an algorithm flags as a potential firearm component . A separate provision would expose researchers, journalists, and educators to felony charges simply for possessing or sharing certain design files.

  • zikzak025@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 天前

    So what you mean to tell me is that every 3D printer in New York is going to come with an index of firearm components?

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 天前

      There is no such technology. This will effectively ban 3d printers until there is. It’s not as trivial as they make it sound

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 天前

      Given that the printer itself has just enough computing power to just understand “by how many steps I need to move that motor” (or little more) I suppose it should be done at a slicer level, which would be interesting to do.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 天前

          Yes, but you can tied the printer to a specific slicer in a number of ways.

          And you can make the electronic board in a way so that you cannot phisically update the firmware. (Putting it in a read only memory for example)
          You can alter the firmware (that you save is in a read only memory) to refuse to load gcode directly from a USB stick, you can have the firmware ask the slicer for a specific handshake protocol. Basically once you can couple the firmware with the slicer and make it not upgradable you can do whatever you want except maybe heavy cryptography. If the only way to change the firmware is to replace the board, I bet a lot of people would do not it and who would do it can simply build their printer from scratch.

          It would make the printer more exepnsive, sure, but that does not seems to be a problem to the law. Also, it would kill the opensource slicer (or at least try).

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 天前

      Not to mention that someone’s going to come out with a jailbreak option for every 3D printer within a couple of weeks of this being implemented at a manufacturing scale.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 天前

        I mean, at the end of the day, we’re talking stepper motors, switches, a resistive heater, (EDIT: or two. Forgot about the heated bed) a thermistor (or two, heated bed again), a few fans. maybe a solenoid. What you’re usually buying with a 3d printer is the hardware and the mechanical engineering that went into it, The on board software is… sufficient, but there’s a reason things like Octoprint and Klipper are so popular.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 天前

        Someone outside the USA who is annoyed at stupid US policies fucking over the rest of the world yet again.