• shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was around 50 years ago. Just about everyone lived in poverty compared to today.

    Housing is the standout difference. Housing was much, much more affordable. But also most houses were small and simple. Didn’t have much insulation, no air con, lucky to have more than one power point in a room, often built with dangerous materials like asbestos. Dangerous old wiring.

    The billionaire owned media and foreign influence is heavily shaping public opinion for their own purposes. Oddly there is no dissatisfaction when a conservative government is engaging in massive wealth transfer to the rich and multinationals and closing all our industry. Then the sky is falling when we have a Labor government trying to get us through difficult times created by circumstances outside their control.

    • FreedomAdvocate
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeh I’m sure people would prefer not being able to afford a home than to have to settle for owning an affordable small and simple home…….

      🤔

    • freedickpics@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Your point on housing and government is a pure cop out. Plenty of people would be happy smaller basic houses if they could just afford them. But they’ve all been either knocked down, renovated to inflate the value, or still exist but are no longer affordable. And labor are, at best, complicit in many of the problems people have. They used a vaguely defined ‘skills shortage’ to justify one of the biggest migration rates into the country in its history while barely lifting a finger to increase housing supply. Yes, the libs would’ve been 10x worse, but that isn’t an excuse to just disregard criticism of Labor