How can you take part in subjecting other people to this kind of thing and still think you are justified in doing it? People that almost certainly had nothing to do personally with what your beef is with the more extreme members of their factions. They also can’t think that this serves any point other than to be sadistic, if your goal was complete annihilation you would just shoot them.
I mean, holy fuck.
Admittedly, I’m not going to read this.
How is it even possible?! On the physical level.
I really should have just went to sleep.
Absolutely abhorrent.
Good night, everyone.
Also here’s a topical petition
https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/initiatives/details/2025/000005_en
The horrors you commit in service of God. I know not what I believe as far as theology goes, but if there is any sort of benevolent god or gods, these people are going to face the worst punishment they have. If there are no gods, may this world give them the punishment they deserve, as unlikely as that may be. Organized religion is the worst thing to ever befall humanity, and it may wind up being the end of us someday. These actions would have made even most Nazis skittish.
War crime Nr. … how much already?
-2147483648
Who thought that the lesson they would take away from the Holocaust would be to “Pay it forward?”
This some Dirlewanger level shit
Using DOGS to RAPE people is CLEARLY spelt out in the TORAH you ANTI SEMITE!
-The BBC!
A sentence I neither expected to see nor wanted to.
Like unholy shit, what the hell is going on with those people?
Can’t say shit about Isreal even though they’re fucked up like this
Western “civilization” reaction to Israel and Russia are amazing. If this were Russian we will see these war crimes in every media 24h , while with Israel, you get arrested or questioned for denouncing the crimes.
No dude what the actual fuck
What the fuck
And that’s what we know, imagine all the things that will probably never get out.
literally
“Source I’ve never seen claims someone on Twitter heard something outrageous from an anonymous source”
Did this happen? Maybe. Is this upvoted solely because of people’s pre-existing biases? Yup.
Honestly, I hope this one is fake. It’s fucked up if real.
Novara Media is a socialist news organization, so they definitely have a bias, but their informational reporting is no less credible than the BBC or Guardian. They have a decently large presence in the UK.
X to doubt.
You’re wrong. I’ve been reading/listening to Novara every day for over five years. They are left wing in opinion, and 100% factual in their reporting. They are more responsible about correcting errors than the BBC or the Guardian. As the other response, I would have ditched them at any point if I found them to be dishonest.
Why would their factual reporting not be reliable? Their core audience is extremely well educated who would not tolerate blatant falsehoods like right-wing tabloid audiences do.
And yet, everybody smashed upvote on this rage bait without reading it. Education and wealth only gets you so far.
TBF they didn’t really make direct factual claims here, they just quoted the sources, so even if it’s not true it’s not a lie. I’m not sure how often Fox News just straight up lies either.
deleted by creator
One source appears to be the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights. It says in the article.
Where did they get the information from?
Obscure self styled human rights organizations are often used to launder information and give it more credibility. This isn’t HRW, Amnesty, or B’Tselem. They aren’t perfect either, but more credible.
They got the information from someone who was raped by a dog. It says in the article.
The analyst in “says analyst” was a guy on Twitter.
It is mentioned that PCHR recorded similar testimony from a Palestinian source later on.
Again, maybe, maybe not.
“geopolitical expert” it says. Here’s his Google scholar page. Seems legit. I mean I guess he is still “a guy on twitter”, in that he has a Twitter account
Ragebait works on everyone. You just need to know what buttons to push.
I was reticent to post this, given that it’s based off of one person’s hearsay. What tipped me over is that it is confirmation of stories also relayed by Palestinian prisoners in the fall of 2025 (linked in the article) about the goings on in the Sde Teiman torture camp.
Al-Jazeera by the way reports that the IDF soldiers who were at the center of a very public case of gruesome sexual abuse of prisoners in the same torture camp are returning to duty.
End the genocidal Israeli apartheid regime. Boycott Divest Sanction. Criminals at the Hague.
Dogs used as tools of rape are mentioned multiple times in the report.
That’s not a credible human rights organization. HRW or Amnesty are credible.
Who says they are not a credible organization?
Thank you for the context. It’s important.
Yes, someone who could not possibly have heard the Palestinian allegations has come forward to say they are true.
Of the two guards he spoke to, “one had seen this happen and said it was too awful to talk about. The other said that he had heard about it from others and believed it was true. This happened. This is happening still. The evidence is too overwhelming.”
I wouldn’t call this overwhelming evidence. Could it have happened? Painfully, yes. Should an article have been published that guards have admitted this happens? Not on this evidence.
The rules of courtroom evidence cannot be the rules for journalism, or we would NEVER hear about atrocities like this.
i think regardless of the veracity of the article, the fact that israel has a TORTURE CAMP is something that should be highlighted
I don’t think that’s the official name.
That would be funny.
