- https://piefed.social/modlog?suspect_user_name=rimu%40piefed.social
- https://piefed.social/modlog?suspect_user_name=skavau%40piefed.social
Actions / comments showing that Piefed.social supports Palestine
Actions / comments showing that Piefed.social supports Palestine
Rimus comments in question. Seems like hes very concerned about people defending luminous, less so about the admin of the largest instance being a zionist.
deserved it, ‘flags in banner’ is pretty tangential and no defense for behavior. mrkaplan is very clearly a zionist and anyone apologizing for him is sus
I will say I prefer ‘death to zionism’ because it’s the ideology of that ethnostate which should die and is not worth saving. people can learn
Hitting exactly the root cause here - rimu defending Kaplan, consistently and disturbingly, while going after Luminous.
chef’s kiss, nothing to add.
Not a complaint about you @Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus BTW, but I think you’d know that. Just commenting on my agreed preferred phrasing.
nah don’t worry about it, you’re both not wrong that this phrasing would have been better for a display name.
Looks like I need to go instance shopping again
Would avoid anything on piefed
eh, theres a fork already.
anarchist.nexus itself is on piefed, while dbzer0 is on lemmy.
A fork of piefed?? But why?
Because anarchist.nexus uses it and rimu has started getting… Opinionated with some configs.
Forking is not exactly a big deal, and a good way to hedge against unexpected changes that are catastrophic. What’s the worry?
Because it doesn’t seem worth forking. From what I looked at it would need to just be rewriten so why fork.
Its currently running anarchist.nexus, so… thats why. Its sensible to have a fork.
It just seems like a ton of work for a small upside
It’s the superior software from a usability point. And it actually has feature growth rather then beg for donation banners.