• Goferking0@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    https://lemmy.world/comment/23360184

    look of course he did because people like the former admin wouldn’t accept anything else

    Seems like agreeing.

    else piefed.social would have done the same.

    But piefed.social did defed based on rimu saying they were doing the same in response to Kaplan saying it had happened?

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      AFAIK piefed.social was set to follow l.w defederation automatically and this was synchronized this way. Rimu reversed it immediately when he noticed

        • FreedomAdvocate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Careful, saying that seems to be possibly ban worthy going by the banning mods words above.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I think it’s generally useful to make sure to get upset about the right things and not make assumptions

        • Skavau@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Piefed allows admins to delete accounts locally, but that hasn’t got anything to do with defederation. I don’t think this has specifically happened to any anarchist-nexus member.

          This is just “people can get banned and get banned in a more intense way” on Piefed.