As an American myself, I’ve asked several people this question. No one seems to know why either. Is it strategic position in the world? I don’t think they have anything the US can exploit besides that really. Am I missing something? Political arguing aside what exactly is the motivation? Thanks for any explanations.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Not really. There are plenty of cases in history where conquest results in establishing a tributary or proxy state. Japan conquered Manchuria in WWII, the fact that they set up a puppet government does not change that fact at all.

    The word you’re looking for is annexation. I’m not “redefining” anything.