• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Okay, but booze, nicotine, and crack were also pretty addictive.

    Idk if I’d trade The Algorithm epidemic of the 2020s for wood grain alcohol from the 1920s

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Okay, but booze, nicotine, and crack were also pretty addictive.

      And heavily controlled, regulated and legislated. Algorithms aren’t

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, those are also harmful technologies that harmed societies more or less depending on the historical and geopolitical context.

      Right now, the algorithm is more harmful than those because everyone is addicted to them. The sheer amount of time waste and collective brainpower that is being degraded or never even being developed is staggering and will stunt our society for decades to come.

      Even fentanyl, while incurring a much more dramatic and tragic cost on individuals, has a fraction of the impact on society that the algorithm will have due to the scale of our collective addiction.

      It’s like how wage theft has a relatively low impact on individuals but combined represents significantly more money stolen than all other crime nationwide.

      The effects are spread out over many individual people, but it has an overall dampening effect on the growth and development of communities.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Right now, the algorithm is more harmful than those because everyone is addicted to them.

        Again, I don’t think you’re acknowledging the difference between chemical addiction and social habit.

        If you spend a week without cell phone reception, you don’t die from withdrawal symptoms.