I don’t rule out the possibility that a lot of it is simply down to what I’m used to. I’ve used the Affinity suite from the start, and the way Inkscape works (much like GIMP) isn’t quite so… how should I put it? “Idiot-proof”. I’m a hobbyist; I don’t do this professionally. A slightly more “normal” interface would be a strong argument for people like me to give Inkscape another chance.
Otherwise, I perceived the application as feeling unfinished; it crashed on me occasionally and/or felt sluggish. I get it: there’s little money behind Inkscape for quality assurance, and you can’t expect FLOSS to have people working full-time on optimising the user experience. But then why use Inkscape at all? Because it’s “the best there is on Linux”? That brings us back to my original point: why switch to Linux in the first place?
There are reasons why Wine exists. One of those reasons is that free software has a quality problem. Am I completely off the mark here?
I don’t rule out the possibility that a lot of it is simply down to what I’m used to. I’ve used the Affinity suite from the start, and the way Inkscape works (much like GIMP) isn’t quite so… how should I put it? “Idiot-proof”. I’m a hobbyist; I don’t do this professionally. A slightly more “normal” interface would be a strong argument for people like me to give Inkscape another chance.
Otherwise, I perceived the application as feeling unfinished; it crashed on me occasionally and/or felt sluggish. I get it: there’s little money behind Inkscape for quality assurance, and you can’t expect FLOSS to have people working full-time on optimising the user experience. But then why use Inkscape at all? Because it’s “the best there is on Linux”? That brings us back to my original point: why switch to Linux in the first place?
There are reasons why Wine exists. One of those reasons is that free software has a quality problem. Am I completely off the mark here?