• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Who knew that taking funding for scientific research away from government institutes and universities and giving it to ketamine-addicted con men would have negative consequences.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The damage is done. Unless there’s a sudden reversal of cultural attitudes, the US has given up. The only way I see this happening is if the space race sparks another push for STEM.

    Like, actual STEM. It seems like nobody has noticed but all anybody has cared about anymore is watching the stock market go up. It’s no longer about the pursuit of science and technology but how that can be used to make money.

    They need to land some people on the moon again. Make it a big deal about sci-fi type shit. Orbit space stations around the Earth and the moon. Make it a daily life kind of thing that the population can get engaged with.

    It’s apparent that people are weary of technology anymore cause all we’ve had is brain rot designed to extract value from us. People need to see science and technology as something hopeful again.

    • darthinvidious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      With the price of tuition now a days, and an already poor education system as it were, I don’t think the US is getting back to anything.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The only way I see this happening is if the space race sparks another push for STEM.

      A major reason the space race resulted in US technological superiority was because they didn’t Gulag former Nazi scientists.

      USA is very much cooked.

  • PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Is overtaking?” Sorry buddy, that point lies in the past. China dominates nearly all of the relevant future technologies and is still ramping up its investments. There’s no stopping them now.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      China sent their best and brightest to be educated in American colleges, which American kids can’t get without taking on a lifetime of student debt. Most American kids aren’t rich enough to deserve to be smart.

      It’s okay, though, we’ll need those bodies for the war. Trump is competing against Putin numbers for sacrifices. 1.2 million so far in Ukraine. Trump has some catching up to do. He wants to be able to brag to his Sociopathic Oligarch buddies at dinner at Maralago about how many soldiers have died for him, and the higher the number the better. That’s how much they love him.

      American students don’t need college, that’s for the Chinese who build our stuff. The Draft is coming for American students. They should be willing to die to protect American Freedom.®

    • kinther@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even in the AI sector they seem to be only a pace or two behind. Their models are as good and require less compute. It really does feel like we are falling behind in everything.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Their models are as good and require less compute.”

        In a sense, this is exactly why I think that China will inevitably overtake the US in this field too. Even besides things like Deepseek, which distills LLMs dominant in the US into a more streamlined model, China also seems to be putting more resources into researching AI that doesn’t need to start out with mahoosive amounts of data.

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We have been running on old money for decades. We used China for our slave labor, and now they make the best stuff and don’t need us. That’s why the US is 70% service industry now. We are basically two rich trust fund babies jerking ourselves from off surrounded by slave labor, but eventually we run out of money. We are at the running out of money phase

      • maplesaga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The US still holds the reserve currency, that they force other countries to use via military force. Which allows them to export their inflation, and to print money to build up the military they use to protect its usage.

        I think the problem is the population got too heavy into taking in debt via this mechanism, always asking for more and more tax cuts and more social programs, and China themselves stopped buying US treasuries in 2016. Then locking Russia out of US bonds further exacerbated the issue, as its no longer seen as a neutral asset, so bond yields rise as less people buy them.

        Then the tariffs and higher interest rates cause debt crisis in other countries by limiting their access to USD, which makes them attempt to move away, which is likely how gold prices nearly doubled in a single year. Its pretty wild whats happening.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s truely a team effort the Republicans and Democrats are the ratchet effect manifested.

        The FPTP system ensures you will only get those two choices so if you want to effect change its probably easiest to do it at the primary level.

        People always say ‘progressives can’t get elected nationally’ or whatever forgetting FPTP ensures things will swap back (under the assumption that one side doesn’t flip fascist before that happens, big assumption in this climate I know) because eventually people will tire of the person in power and either vote for ‘change’ or stay home.

  • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not just in science. In everything.

    America is being lapped by a fascist Pooh Bear because 30% of Americans are mouthbreathers with Bible kinks.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sometimes I forget one of Trump’s first agendas was nuking research funding and using a keyword filter against grant submissions that had words like “trans” without conntext.

    Seems like so long ago compared to an active war with Iran.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is not just cutting research funding, but also making migrating to the US much much harder. The US has amazing pay for the absolute top researchers, which makes it attractive for even migrants from other developed countries. However life in most other countries is better then one of the new migrant concentration camps the US is building with ICE.

    Probably the Anglosphere apart from the US and then other rich developed countries will benefit fro this the most. They all have somewhat working migration systems in place to attract talent. China so far lacks that, but they probably set one up soon.

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s because they make everything and have spare money to spend on research.

      The US runs on debt, and we are running out of debt.

      • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I feel as though the low standard of living of the average Chinese national is a more decisive factor. The resources that could be spent on public welfare programs are spent on research and subsidies instead.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I mean, resources aren’t being spent on public welfare programs in the US either. We only have a higher standard of living because of the legacy of (roughly) the New Deal era, when we were investing in it as well as unions winning a lot of labor reforms. Those preexisting advantages have only been slowly eroding for the last 40-odd years.

          • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            They absolutely are.

            Let’s say I get into a car accident or have cancer. Treatment involves expensive chemotherapy, blood transfusions, and multiple rounds of major surgery.

            If I’m in the poorest 10%-30% of the population, the care is provided free of charge. If I’m poor-but not that poor- I have the option to receive the expensive treatment and just not pay. It will just negatively impact my credit score, but I can also get away with “paying what I can afford.”

            …this is just one example. Everything from our food to our electronics are subsidized by the government. Most of the resources are more or less taken from poorer nations. If they don’t play ball, we withhold aid, bribe officials, loan their enemies weapons, or finance a coup.

            • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Saying ‘It will just negatively impact your credit score’ like it’s nothing in a capitalist nation where nearly all financial trust is based on how effectively you pay back your creditors is a pretty wild take.

              Especially when a car and home are the bare minimum for most people to be able to function in the US (public transport is laughable anywhere outside a metropolis) and the average person isn’t getting either without a loan.

              I wouldn’t be so quick to ignore medical debt. The average retired couple spends $350000 on medical expenses in the US. The system is a lot more dysfunctional than you make it out to be.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Running up medical debt, declaring bankruptcy, and expecting the inflated costs being charged by the insurance system to just sort of absorb it is entirely different from the government having public welfare programs!

              You do see how it’s different, right?!

          • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It’s more like poor China with their average $5000 per year income.

            They also have a 0% homeowner rate. All property is owned by the state. As for the houses they do “own”, the typical city apartment or rural homestead is…deficient by Western standards.