• Hapankaali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Me neither, probably. But it’s still a good idea in principle. The spread of malicious misinformation and propaganda has already led to millions of deaths. If we have to give up some anonymous shitposting to curb these excesses, it’s worth it.

      • GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        The spread of malicious misinformation and propaganda has already led to millions of deaths.

        Malicious misinformation and propaganda is constantly spread without any sort of anonymity, so I can’t see how this is relevant.

        • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Chemotherapy does not cure all forms of cancer, therefore chemotherapy is not relevant to cancer treatment.

          • Bloefz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            No but you don’t give everyone chemotherapy just because some people have cancer

          • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Home searches would catch some criminals, therefore a blanket search warrant is relevant to stopping crime.

            • nogooduser@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              That’s a little too close to reality for comfort. 😟

              We have several governments saying that being able to read some people’s encrypted messages would catch some criminals, therefore we need to be able to read everyone’s encrypted messages.

              • Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Literally 2 days ago I was arguing with family about privacy online and I was the only person in car that gave a fuck about it. The 3 other family members were totally ok with being spied on online from start to finish and have this information used against because they had “nothing to hide” and that caring about it would not change anything in their personal lives anyway and that we don’t live in a country that actively cracks down on people against certain things. No example or angle I brought up would change their mind. This was the moment I gave up on those family members in my head. Ugh…

      • chinaski@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        So youre the type of person who gives up some freedoms in the name of security and comfort.

      • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Malicious misinformation gets spread by plenty of elected officials and journalists every day. You don’t have to be anonymous to do that. Hell pretty much the entire US government does it.