• velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If you read the article and the study it references, selective sex abortion has affected these numbers.

    Its not the only reason, but this is also not my only comment about it here.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure, it’s a contributor, everything is a contributor. But the main thing is that young men aren’t dying like they used to in the past. That’s the primary mechanism skewing gender fertility ratios. Sex selective abortions are relevant in some countries to some extent, but globally are almost nothing. It’s a red herring.

      When you have 5 extra boys born for every 100 girls the default position is there are more reproductive aged men than women. The fact we haven’t had that has been because young boys and men disproportionately died compared to young girls and women globally. Modern medicine, laws, and general peace in most of the world has stopped that trend.