not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agodon't let google alter the deallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square182fedilinkarrow-up11.4Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.38Karrow-down1imagedon't let google alter the deallemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square182fedilink
minus-squarethethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days ago You make a rule that public service can only buy devices using AOSP-bis based systems (or even better: states choose their own AOSP distros) don’t give Google the monopoly better: “You make a rule that public service can only buy devices using libre systems”
minus-squarematlag@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoIf you fork, by definition, they no longer have the monopoly. The fork does not even have to follow Google’s updates.
minus-squarethethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 hours agoYes. But still, it should be “libre systems” rather than “AOSP systems”.
don’t give Google the monopoly
better: “You make a rule that public service can only buy devices using libre systems”
If you fork, by definition, they no longer have the monopoly. The fork does not even have to follow Google’s updates.
Yes. But still, it should be “libre systems” rather than “AOSP systems”.