Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoMost could work on anyone reallylemmy.worldimagemessage-square224fedilinkarrow-up1571arrow-down1101
arrow-up1470arrow-down1imageMost could work on anyone reallylemmy.worldReturn_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square224fedilink
minus-squareAnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down1·2 months agoI mean, that is the definition of ragebaiting
minus-squarestickly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·2 months agoI think rage baiting requires some degree of deniability and subterfuge. The “[normal question] if you were athletic?” is a good example. The ones that are just “Shut up short man” are too crass
minus-squareSeptugenarianSenate@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agocrass, but also transparently so, which is why they are less effective as ragebait
minus-squareNerdyTimesOrWhatever@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoRelax, its not that deep.
I mean, that is the definition of ragebaiting
I think rage baiting requires some degree of deniability and subterfuge. The “[normal question] if you were athletic?” is a good example. The ones that are just “Shut up short man” are too crass
crass, but also transparently so, which is why they are less effective as ragebait
Nah you got it wrong
Relax, its not that deep.