• SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    hurray, 6 more years of Collins. That’s what you want, right? Because that’s the reality you’re promoting.

    I don’t know what fairyland unicorn candidate you’ve got hidden somewhere, but we have to live in this reality. And in this reality, the choice was between Schumers handpicked corpo geriatric AIPAC Janet Mills, the GOP lapdog Susan Collins, and Platner. Make your pick lefty. Or run yourself. If no one is good enough for you, then go on, go set the example.

    • midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You can’t escape the fact that Platner is either:

      A. A liar, a mercenary, and a nazi

      or

      B. A ptsd suffering veteran with an incredibly unstable personality which currently aligns with our political views

      • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I can escape your false dichotomy, and do. I reject your premise on the grounds that not everyone sees things in extremes. You should try it.

        • midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It’s not an extreme, the second scenario appears to be the mainstream view among democrats, although with less focus on the potential for an unstable individual to do unexpected things.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            15 hours ago

            the second scenario appears to be the mainstream view among democrats

            Why the fuck would “the mainstream view among democrats” be even the slightest bit persuasive? Cite proof or GTFO.

          • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            19 hours ago

            dude… you’re really doubling down on this. So, trauma shaming is fine. You’re saying “hey people with PTSD, you’re unstable and shouldn’t be trusted. Your traumas make you a worse person”. That’s what you’re putting out. You good? Are you good with that message?

            What’s a parallel here? You about to tell rape victims that their traumas makes them unreliable judges of character? Does that sound alright to you? Same thought process. Is that the kind of person you are? Someone who shames people for having trauma in their past?

            • midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              19 hours ago

              No I reject that completely, leaders need to be held to a higher standard. There are so many ways for him to invest in and volunteer his time to help his community that don’t involve giving him power over others. Mental health issues and/or an unstable personality should absolutely be taken into account for senate candidates, lest we get another Fetterman. Additionally, just framing it him having PTSD is rather disingenuous. Platner was not the victim of a war, he was the openly admitted participant in a black ops wet-work team. He has, under his own volition, admitted to torturing people. If he feels traumatized by that, well, i have a hard time being very sympathetic. Comparing that to a victim of rape is probably not your best work.