• Chaunticleer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Can somebody explain something stupid to me? What exactly is wrong with Chromium? Does Google have backdoor access to anyone who’s running a Chromium based program or something?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 hours ago

        What exactly is wrong with Chromium?

        It gives Google hegemony over web standards.

      • dgdft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        99
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        They abuse the fuck out of their monopoly, basically.

        They made changes to limit the usefulness of adblockers (Manifest V3), they tried to force a remote attestation API (WEI API) a few years back that would let them do stuff like fully block users who aren’t running locked-down operating systems from using online banking software or accessing Youtube, they added many chrome-specific web APIs that are extremely helpful for fingerprinting and lock users into the chrome ecosystem, etc.

        And if you’re running stock chromium, there’s a fuckton of telemetry calling home to Google servers constantly.

        • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          And browser is such a complex piece of software that you cannot just fork it easily and change those things within a weekend with a bunch of unpaid volunteers.

        • 87Six@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          So basicaly everything that made it through the android-google ecosystem also made it through chromium, is my take

      • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        As a web dev I hate the trend of websites relying on chromium-specific quirks, there are a handful of sites I need to use which refuse to work in any non-chromium browser, and customer support will always tell you to just use chrome as if you’re not a normal person for using Firefox. So yeah what’s wrong with chromium to me is that it’s the new internet explorer when it comes to web standards. Websites and large businesses can afford to just not care if they are following web standards as long as it works in chrome, and if you have a problem it’s your fault for not using chrome.

        • almost1337@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, we’re back to the days of websites only supporting Internet Explorer because of proprietary features and weird quirks.

        • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          This is why I switched from LibreWolf. If I had to have a Chromium browser installed as a backup anyway for few important sites, I might as well use Chromium. Imo Chromium has won. It owns the web landscape. I’ve given up

          • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            Why don’t you at least use Ungoogled Chromium, Cromite, or Helium Browser? At least they prioritize security and privacy equally while not being tied to Ghoulgle.

      • rozodru@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        which you can get on any Chromium based browser, brave is nothing special in that regard. you can have functioning adblock with Vivaldi also.