I’m not trying to troll, I’m genuinely curious. Thinking about deer specifically, it doesn’t seem like visual camouflage would really help much when hunting them. Deer sense predators by sensitive hearing (big ears) and smell (long snout). Their eyes are on the sides of their head, so they detect motion rather than high-resolution.

So trying to blend in with the surroundings doesn’t seem to be an advantage in this case. Assuming all this, what’s the point of clothing with camo print on it?

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Depends on the deer. Some species have good eyesight. If you live on a big open field that is a very effective way to detect predators.

    Breaking up the contour of your human shape is why you have camo when hunting animals with poor colour vision. They can’t tell if you’re a boulder or human but no big gray blob is supposed to move. Grass and branches swaying in the wind are all over the place.

    You may also use the same clothes for hunting birds, which usually have very good vision, including color.

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Most of the hunters I know sit in a tree stand and chug Busch lights. So it’s basically a sniper nest. And they wear camo because… reasons?

          • zxqwas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 hours ago

            There is also no shortage of people willing to sell you something you think works.

            Golfers buy expensive clubs, gamers buy expensive hardware, hunters buy expensive clothes. None of it is guaranteed make you more successful, but I’ll sell you this golf ball polish that is guaranteed to make your slice go 10m further off into the rough for only $5.99

                • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  About $60. They put the transceivers on either end of the cable. Only necessary if you require 40 Gbps at distances over 2.5’ or .8m. Not necessary for most applications, including 8k streaming.

                  A gen5 NVME can read at about 15 Gbps, which will not saturate the thunderbolt at 20Gbps unless you have a raid array. At 40Gbps, you would need three sticks. You will ALSO need that much hardware on the other end to sustain the transfer.

              • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                My friend paid $100 (roughly $150 today) for one of these cables around 2008/2009 when HDTVs were fairly new. $50 would be a bargain comparatively.

                  • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    I’m fairly certain it was but can’t recall for sure. The guy at Best Buy or Circuit City really did the hard sales pitch to convince him that it was worth the money and he’d definitely notice the difference. I recall making fun of him for it and his rebuttal was that it also came with a warranty so he could swap it out at some future date (since, you know, it’s so common for HDMI cables to wear out from all the data traveling through them).

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Most ones here will either spot a deer while doing their farm runs and then go and hike around the area trying to track it down. Shooting deer from a helicopter or dugout is extremely looked down on. (shooting ducks from a bivy is fine tho).