• FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Without being able to offer any idea of a solution though, saying that means nothing. The company either gets shut down and those users get fucked and have no VPN, or the company stays alive and the users have no VPN but have the option to get one again.

    The point is there’s no real way the lifetime licenses get honoured.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just honor them and take the loss. The new owners did a bad deal. In many countries it would be highly illegal to cancel these contracts while continuing the business. Either liquidate the company or honor the deals. Fuck capitalism.

      • FreedomAdvocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you’d rather they just close the company down, so then no one can use their VPN. Big brain move.

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The people operating the company do not deserve to run it. Maybe they should declare bankruptcy and let somebody who will honor the contracts buy it.

          Allowing this kind of anti-consumer behaviour just allows them to juggle the company around to get out of contracts.

          • FreedomAdvocate
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            OK so you’re against the sale of the company in the first place? That’s a different story.

            • x00z@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes I think they should just honor the contracts and make a tiny bit less profit.

              They could even just add some sane limits if those were not present yet.

              • FreedomAdvocate
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You have no idea about why they sold or how the financials of the business were.

                Of the contracts stated that the offer could be changed at the company’s choosing, are you ok with it then?

                • x00z@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Sorry bud but I’m not going to continue replying to you because of your condescending tone. Are you ok with that?

                  • FreedomAdvocate
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t care if you reply or not, it just makes you look like you can’t defend/support your position to even the most basic of questioning.