• rubber_chicken [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Could this mean that fecal transplants are generally useful? The mechanism it proposes is that microbial diversity helps with autism symptoms. Does the helping peter out when a person reaches typical microbial diversity, or could somebody with typical microbial diversity reap some benefits by increasing it from there? How far is a typical person from the theoretical peak microbial diversity where they have a population of pretty much every microbe that’s in somebody’s gut?

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      We could do the same thing by eating fresh, whole foods. I’m not sure how to do that with UPFs not being illegal.

    • theturtlemoves [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess it’s more like ‘having gut microbes that can help you digest the food you eat is helpful’, and less pokemon collecting all the microbes that can grow in your gut. H. pylori can grow in your gut, but you probably don’t want it.

    • generally useful in terms of autism or generally useful in other fields of medicine? because the latter is ABSOLUTELY true.

      I don’t think it’s really possible for there to be a peak diversity like you describe, though. changing your diet even slightly compared to your usual meals is enough to radically change the balance of organisms in your gut, and the reproductive time for most bacteria means spontaneous changes in DNA can change this balance within hours.

      this does make me think, that perhaps a dialectical approach to managing gut health would benefit those taking on research in gastrointestinal medicine.