I am sorry, but I didn’t see any actual exploit evidence, but just the ad “groundbreaking” Apple’s MIE and previous CVEs mentioned.
Nor there is any use of LLM/“AI” explicitly stated, too, except the article itself it refers to, which looks like LLM-written: 8ksec.io/mie-deep-dive-enabling-apps [web-archived]
Update (2026-05-17_13-09_0):
- In other words, it feels more like an ad for Mythos and Apple but based on absolutely no evidence at this point of time, and Mythos is mentioned at Tom’s Hardware article only.
Of course, but the possibly LLM-generated article at 8ksec has no actual preview of even undisclosed proof-of-concept (PoC).
And the article is used as the main source at the Tom’s Hardware article, too.
Therefore, the question is, what is the main point of both the articles, if?:
No PoC preview is stated at all;
No LLM use is stated in the initial source (at 8ksec);
An explicit LLM use at 8ksec is mentioned in the Tom’s Hardware - Mythos by Anthropic;
In other words, it feels more like an ad for Mythos and Apple but based on absolutely no evidence at this point of time, and Mythos is mentioned at Tom’s Hardware article only.
I am sorry, but I didn’t see any actual exploit evidence, but just the ad “groundbreaking” Apple’s MIE and previous CVEs mentioned.
Nor there is any use of LLM/“AI” explicitly stated, too, except the article itself it refers to, which looks like LLM-written: 8ksec.io/mie-deep-dive-enabling-apps [web-archived]
Update (2026-05-17_13-09_0):
- In other words, it feels more like an ad for Mythos and Apple but based on absolutely no evidence at this point of time, and Mythos is mentioned at Tom’s Hardware article only.
It’s Tom’s Hardware. You only share Tom’s Hardware articles when you need something to support your narrative but search results yield nothing.
“No! That can’t be!.. Oh! Tom’s Hardware gets it!”
Shame. It was actually pretty good until about a decade ago
They said details will be released once it’s been patched. If somebody has an Apple priv sec they’re not going to giving it away for free.
Of course, but the possibly LLM-generated article at 8ksec has no actual preview of even undisclosed proof-of-concept (PoC).
And the article is used as the main source at the Tom’s Hardware article, too.
Therefore, the question is, what is the main point of both the articles, if?:
In other words, it feels more like an ad for Mythos and Apple but based on absolutely no evidence at this point of time, and Mythos is mentioned at Tom’s Hardware article only.