1. I called a corpse a corpse (post contains multiple pictures of chests of multiple animals)
  2. Get called loud, obnoxious and ridiculous
  3. User types 380+ words on why my view is ridiculous (see linked post for more of their comments, my only two comments are in the image)
  4. I replied in an annoyed tone but did not use insults
  5. I am banned for “rule 1, be kind”

Post (TW: animal corpses): https://lemmy.world/post/45494863/23173926

Note: “the rules of this site” in my comment refer to rule 6 of lemmy.world which states:

No visual content depicting executions, murder, suicide, dismemberment, visible innards, excessive gore, or charred bodies. No content depicting, promoting or enabling animal abuse.

  • Redjard@reddthat.com
    181·
    2 days ago

    I don’t think you’re making much sense in the reply there, but it shouldn’t be a kindness issue, yeah.
    The other person also was not banned.
    I have to assume it was not about that reply at all but rather the initial comment.

    Which yes, given the context, is quite inappropriate you got to realize.
    Going to someones stuff they care about and calling it a technically correct but off-putting/controversial description is not nice. Either you are trying to ruin it for everyone there, or trying to bring an unwanted discussion into the post.

    1. BE KIND
      Food should bring people together, not tear them apart. Think of the human on the other side of the screen, and don’t troll, harass, engage in bigotry, or otherwise make others uncomfortable with your words.

    You should have easily been able to predict you would make people feel uncomfortable, writing “Ah yes, a corpse, how apetizing” on stuff clearly viewed and intended by the poster as food not gore.

    • lookingforanALFpolycule@lemmy.worldOP
      322·
      2 days ago

      Going to someones stuff they care about and calling it a technically correct but off-putting/controversial description is not nice. Either you are trying to ruin it for everyone there, or trying to bring an unwanted discussion into the post.

      I feel like calling it “their stuff” when I was also a Foodporn user and posted there before is not fair. I did not go over to c/meat or whatever.

      • Susaga@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        192·
        2 days ago

        And they didn’t go to c/vegan. Just because you personally don’t eat it doesn’t make it not food.

      • Redjard@reddthat.com
        14·
        2 days ago

        their

        Specifically the op of that post. “Their” in the singular sense. “Going to that persons stuff”.

        I did not go over to c/meat or whatever.

        That one post should tell you that was not a vegan space. And what you wrote was not kind either way. You put it as a generic statement (op clearly didn’t share), not say as a criticism of the sub. For example

        “This sub is nice but it’s a shame there are meat posts strewn in between, which are really off-putting to me (no offense to <op>)”

        What you wrote was clearly provocatory to op specifically, who did nothing wrong posting allowed food in the food com.

        Edit: To put it more bluntly, your comment is “people shouldn’t post meat” not “I don’t want to see meat anymore”.