

You’re pushing your choices onto innocent animals who do not have a voice they can use to protest your violence.


You’re pushing your choices onto innocent animals who do not have a voice they can use to protest your violence.


It’s natural to shit in the forest. But more on topic; there’s loads of immoral things happening in nature (eg rape and infanticide) yet we’d never use that as a justification in those cases.


I’m not being oppressed, the animals are.


Yeah I literally can’t do that because they banned me


Personally think it’s pretty extreme to kill animals


Going to someones stuff they care about and calling it a technically correct but off-putting/controversial description is not nice. Either you are trying to ruin it for everyone there, or trying to bring an unwanted discussion into the post.
I feel like calling it “their stuff” when I was also a Foodporn user and posted there before is not fair. I did not go over to c/meat or whatever.
Even beekeepers think beekeepers are cruel: https://www.honeybeesuite.com/why-clip-the-wings-of-your-queen/


You are ignoring the victim
I knew who posted this before checking


The restaurant at the end of the universe has genetically engineered animals that want to be eaten. I don’t know if that is consent but it’s definitely unethical. Imagine genetically engineering woman to want to sleep with you. Creepy af.


Healthier? Not for the fish.


Killing fish is not necessary like you said. I understand there is negative effects but that’s not really related to my comment nor the article.


Another positive outcome


Animals aren’t inanimate objects to be rented
Not sure the killed bird cares about your land area usage statistics


Someone tied up with a fancy rope is still tied up
I did not say rotting but yea