• BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    The emphasis when I was younger that exercise was needed to lose weight. Now the emphasis is shifting that eating better and lighter does with exercise an aid in he situation.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Exercise is for building and maintaining muscle and cardio health. The only way it helps in losing weight is that muscles are more energy intensive than fat to maintain.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Yes, specifically:

        Excess activity from your baseline will cause excess caloric output and can result in weight loss. BUT, human bodies are quite adaptable and what used to be excess activity can easily become your new baseline.

        Absolutely, 75-300 minutes of cardio-vascular exercise is good for almost anyone, even if they need to gain weight. The same can be said for hitting every muscle group with resistance training twice a week, to a lesser extent. (Do both if you can, but do the cardio if you can only do one.) EDIT: Neither of these activities has to be done expressly for “exercise” – they are just as good for you when they are part of your work or play or any other purpose.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          75-300 minutes of cardio-vascular exercise is good for almost anyone, even if they need to gain weight

          I appreciate this distinction! I had so much trouble gaining weight until I got into exercise. Finally broke 130lbs once I was cycling 22 miles 3x a week! Exercise was the missing ingredient to getting my metabolism balanced out