• youcantreadthis@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I told the state legisgoblin that if it voted this should exist its opponent would get 20 hours of my time for its campaign next election

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Considering SteamOS includes Valve’s proprietary bits for the Steam client, this likely still applies to Valve and any hardware shipping with SteamOS

    Where is the line? Most Linux distros have some nonfree software too, does it apply to them?

    IMHO the correct legal and constitutional analysis ought to be: distributing software, in either source or binary form, is free speech protected under the US constitution as well as state constitutions. Therefore the government cannot pass laws requiring that operating systems, in general, implement certain features, doesn’t matter which.

    What the government can do is engage in product regulation. It can require that operating systems preinstalled on devices sold in their jurisdiction have certain features. The correct thing to do wouldn’t have been to distinguish FOSS from nonfree operating systems, but operating systems preinstalled on devices from those distributed on the Internet which the user needs to install. That would have covered Android, iOS, macOS and Windows, which is obviously what the legislators were thinking of.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes. If vendors in those states want to then preinstall Linux on a device they would have to find a compliant distro…

        Doesn’t matter much. At least those of us who aren’t engaged in the business of selling computers are unaffected.