Henry Cuellar, Donald Davis, Cleo Fields, Laura Gillen, Vicente Gonzalez, Marcy Kaptur, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and Eugene Vindman

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe you should look it up then. Because, if you answer it for them, it’s not really rhetorical, is it?

      • zoloftt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think you missed the part where I framed it as if I was having a conversation with the person? You’re clearly angry about my choice of literary devices. Sorry to upset you.

        Have a nice day.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          No, that part was very apparent. You having a make believe conversation where you spoke for the other person is the source of our entire conversation. It’s not a literary device, though, is the problem.

          Also, as long as we’re talking about literary devices immediately trying to frame anyone who disagrees with you as “angry” is a classic. Not a device from any respectable literature though of course.