cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/47299437

United flight 236 from Newark to Palma de Mallorca on Saturday night was forced to turn around just an hour after takeoff due to security concerns around a Bluetooth signal. Multiple Redditors claimed to be on the flight and reported that the crew repeatedly requested passengers to turn off their Bluetooth. According to one poster, […]

  • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    link

    So what I’m getting from this, is that you should use a VPN if you’re using the airports wifi.

    Like today’s sponsor…

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        How so? I know many of the vpns sell your information, what if you have a trustworthy vpn, are you suggesting the traffic is compromised at levels before and after the vpn? I mean I know it is to some degree I just don’t know exactly.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Your traffic is already encrypted with https so yes, the “compromise” here is after the VPN.

          I put compromise in quotes since in reality the system is working as designed. You need to use a end to end encrypted messaging app like Signal if you want your communications to stay private.

          • skibidi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Your traffic is encrypted, but it is still possible to see what sites you are visiting without a VPN.

            With a VPN, all your traffic will just be to the VPN server, and any logs of the sites you visit will sit with the VPN operator.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              This is mostly true but I’ll add in some additional info.

              Both QUIC and ECH make it harder to easily track what sites are being visited. Not all websites support these but maybe some day they will be standard.

          • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Thank you for the response I value this information.

            For the record, I suspect signal has a back door for the US government.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              I can say with a very high degree of confidence that Signal does not have a backdoor. What’s far more likely is that you are a victim of a misinformation campaign. In reality there are many organizations that would prefer you that you use something that isn’t end to end encrypted.

              That’s not to say that Signal is flawless as it does have some known weaknesses. The issue is that people tend to fall back to not using encrypted messaging at all which is much worse.

              • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                40 minutes ago

                My mistrust is not based in anything new, just in a decades old knowledge that everything is compromised. Everything.