Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoThat's a nolemmy.worldimagemessage-square266fedilinkarrow-up1687arrow-down1190
arrow-up1497arrow-down1imageThat's a nolemmy.worldReturn_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square266fedilink
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·11 hours agoBecause it’s counterintuitive. You would think that getting people over early means traffic can just flow easier.
minus-squarecodapine@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·10 hours agoYeah, but into a road that is more narrow. You can’t fit twice the volume into a pipe half the size and expect the same throughput.
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoYou could reduce the gap between the cars by ~half.
minus-squarecodapine@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoAre you referring to stopping distances?
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoYou said it couldn’t be done, you didn’t specify a need for it being safely done.
Because it’s counterintuitive. You would think that getting people over early means traffic can just flow easier.
Yeah, but into a road that is more narrow. You can’t fit twice the volume into a pipe half the size and expect the same throughput.
You could reduce the gap between the cars by ~half.
Are you referring to stopping distances?
You said it couldn’t be done, you didn’t specify a need for it being safely done.