Your argument defeats itself. Was Bach’s art not “his art” because he didn’t have a synthesizer? He worked with the medium he preferred and used the tools available and made his art fit within them, he made people feel incredible things that are still relevant today despite not because of the instruments he was limited to, that’s what an artist does.
Your argument defeats itself. Was Bach’s art not “his art” because he didn’t have a synthesizer? He worked with the medium he preferred and used the tools available and made his art fit within them, he made people feel incredible things that are still relevant today despite not because of the instruments he was limited to, that’s what an artist does.